From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:06:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C553EE3.4060202@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020126171545.GB11344@fefe.de> <3C542FE6.7C56D6BD@mandrakesoft.com> <3C5439C1.6000305@evision-ventures.com> <3C543E86.7F0FA37A@gmx.net> <a31q91$upd$1@nell.transmeta.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Followup to: <3C543E86.7F0FA37A@gmx.net>
>By author: root <gunther.mayer@gmx.net>
>In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
>>You don't need a hub to have collisions.
>>
>>Duplex mismatch (i.e. one card in full-duplex, the other in half-duplex)
>>would just show 10-50 KByte/sec transfer rates typically.
>>
>>The card's statistics about "collisions" and "late collisions" would
>>positively prove if this is the case.
>>
>
>Not all cards correctly autoconfigure across a crossover cable (they
>should, but not all do). When autoconfigure is screwed up, as you
>indicate above, things will be *VERY* messed up.
>
Well boys, I know about the ifconfig command, and I just don't see
anything special there.
In esp. no collision indications. I would rather suspect, that there are
maybe some IRQ sharing
problems with the driver, since this got changed as well. However I
simple just didn't
have the time to narrow it down to this. (In esp. doing a recompile with
just the blah_irq -> blash_irqsave
changes enabled.
>
>
> -hpa
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-28 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-26 17:15 question about sparc 64-bit user land Felix von Leitner
2002-01-26 17:24 ` Ben Collins
2002-01-26 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 14:11 ` CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7 Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 16:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 17:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 17:53 ` root
2002-01-27 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-28 12:06 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-01-28 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-27 18:46 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-27 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-28 3:40 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-26 18:07 ` question about sparc 64-bit user land Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C553EE3.4060202@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.