From: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:41:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020131024128.B14482@helen.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291515480.1747-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <87d6zrlefa.fsf@fadata.bg> <15448.28224.481925.430169@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87wuxzjxjm.fsf@fadata.bg>
In-Reply-To: <87wuxzjxjm.fsf@fadata.bg>; from velco@fadata.bg on Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:15:09AM +0200
Quoting Momchil Velikov (velco@fadata.bg):
> >>>>> "John" == John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com> writes:
>
> Momchil> Memory overhead due to allocator overhead is of no concern with the
> Momchil> slab allocator. What matters most is probably the overhead of the
> Momchil> radix tree nodes themselves, compared to the two pointers in struct
> Momchil> page with the hash table approach. rat-4 variant ought to have less
> Momchil> overhead compared to rat-7 at the expense of deeper/higher tree. I
> Momchil> have no figures for the actual memory usage though. For small files it
> Momchil> should be negligible, i.e. one radix tree node, 68 or 516 bytes for
> Momchil> rat-4 or rat-7, for a file of size up to 65536 or 524288 bytes. The
> Momchil> worst case would be very large file with a few cached pages with
> Momchil> offsets uniformly distributed across the whole file, that is having
> Momchil> deep tree with only one page hanging off each leaf node.
>
> John> Isn't this a good place to use AVL trees then, since they balance
> John> automatically? Admittedly, it may be more overhead than we want in
> John> the case where the tree is balanced by default anyway.
>
> The widespread opinion is that binary trees are generally way too deep
> compared to radix trees, so searches have larger cache footprint.
I've posted this before -- my cache-optimized skip list solves the
problem of balanced-tree cache footprint. It uses cacheline-sized
nodes and per-node locking to avoid false-sharing and increase
concurrency. The memory usage for the skip list is also less than
the red-black tree for trees larger than several hundred nodes.
I posted a graph on space consumption (using the Linux vm_area_struct to
calculate space overhead) at:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/skiplist/slrb_space.gif
There are also results for concurrency and performance as a function
of node size.
-josh
--
PRCS version control system http://sourceforge.net/projects/prcs
Xdelta storage & transport http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdelta
Need a concurrent skip list? http://sourceforge.net/projects/skiplist
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-31 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-29 15:54 [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5 Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-29 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 21:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-29 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 23:01 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-29 23:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-29 23:35 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-30 3:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-31 23:44 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 0:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 11:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-01 11:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-02 18:57 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-02 21:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-29 23:02 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-29 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-30 21:25 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-30 22:05 ` John Stoffel
2002-01-30 22:15 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 2:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 13:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 14:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-31 16:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 17:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 19:09 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-31 21:12 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 19:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-31 23:12 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-31 23:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 0:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-16 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 3:56 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 6:32 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 18:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 7:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 9:01 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 9:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 9:07 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 9:13 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-01 18:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 18:44 ` arjan
2002-02-01 19:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-02 15:39 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-05 14:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-05 18:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-05 20:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2002-02-05 20:46 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-06 9:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-05 9:19 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2002-02-01 23:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 14:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 14:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 17:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 15:26 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 23:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-31 10:41 ` Josh MacDonald [this message]
2002-01-31 14:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 14:21 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-30 22:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-30 3:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 23:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-02 19:23 rwhron
2002-02-03 14:31 ` chris
2002-02-03 23:33 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-04 3:59 ` rwhron
2002-02-06 2:04 ` rwhron
2002-02-06 11:44 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-06 21:34 rwhron
2002-02-06 21:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-06 22:06 ` rwhron
2002-02-07 11:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-07 11:32 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020131024128.B14482@helen.CS.Berkeley.EDU \
--to=jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=velco@fadata.bg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.