From: Guest section DW <dwguest@win.tue.nl>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
rajancr@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:46:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020305145004.BFA503FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307143404.A8FFF3FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307145449.GA13062@win.tue.nl> <20020307190635.9DE533FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020307190635.9DE533FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:07:38PM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2002 09:54 am, Guest section DW wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:35:09AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > Long ago I submitted a patch that changed the max pid from 15 bits to
> > 24 or 30 bits or so. (And of course removed the inefficiency noticed
> > by some people in the current thread.)
> I don't think that will solve the N^2 problem
Do you understand "inefficiency"? And "remove"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-07 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 1:57 Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 16:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 16:43 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 3:56 ` Rusty Russell
2002-03-07 14:35 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 14:54 ` Guest section DW
2002-03-07 19:07 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 19:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-07 19:46 ` Guest section DW [this message]
2002-03-07 23:14 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 15:21 ` Dave McCracken
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-05 16:43 Rajan Ravindran
2002-03-05 17:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 19:53 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 20:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 21:59 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 22:48 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 23:40 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 22:37 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl \
--to=dwguest@win.tue.nl \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rajancr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.