All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
To: Guest section DW <dwguest@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	rajancr@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:14:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020307231307.D54F13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020305145004.BFA503FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307190635.9DE533FE08@smtp.linux.ibm.com> <20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20020307194602.GA13092@win.tue.nl>

On Thursday 07 March 2002 02:46 pm, Guest section DW wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:07:38PM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 March 2002 09:54 am, Guest section DW wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:35:09AM -0500, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Long ago I submitted a patch that changed the max pid from 15 bits to
> > > 24 or 30 bits or so. (And of course removed the inefficiency noticed
> > > by some people in the current thread.)
> >
> > I don't think that will solve the N^2 problem
>
> Do you understand "inefficiency"? And "remove"?


I do, what's your point ?
I haven't seen your patch picked up....

I do understand that when you occasionally get into this scenario
of the loop that particularly for large thread counts this stalls the system
for seconds (say 30, with the tasklock held).


-- 
-- Hubertus Franke  (frankeh@watson.ibm.com)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-07 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-05  1:57 Fwd: [Lse-tech] get_pid() performance fix Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 16:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 16:43   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07  3:56 ` Rusty Russell
2002-03-07 14:35   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 14:54     ` Guest section DW
2002-03-07 19:07       ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 19:44         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-07 19:46         ` Guest section DW
2002-03-07 23:14           ` Hubertus Franke [this message]
2002-03-07 15:21     ` Dave McCracken
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-05 16:43 Rajan Ravindran
2002-03-05 17:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 19:53   ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 20:10     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 21:59       ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-05 22:48         ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2002-03-05 23:40           ` Hubertus Franke
2002-03-07 22:37 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020307231307.D54F13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwguest@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=rajancr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.