From: Oskar Liljeblad <oskar@osk.mine.nu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: directory notifications lost after fork?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 22:08:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020310210802.GA1695@oskar> (raw)
The code snipper demonstrates what I consider a bug in the
dnotify facilities in the kernel. After a fork, all registered
notifications are lost in the process where they originally
where registered (the parent process). "lost" here means that
the signal specified with F_SETSIG fcntl no longer is delivered
when notified.
How to reproduce (tested with 2.4.17):
gcc -o dnoticebug dnoticebug.c
dnoticebug & # run in background
cat dnoticebug.c >/dev/null # "notified" should now be printed
cat dnoticebug.c >/dev/null # nothing is printed this time
If you comment out the line with fork below, "notified" *will* be
printed every time you cat dnoticebug.c.
I'm not subscribed to the list so I'd appreciate if you CCed me.
(Otherwise I'd have to use the archives :) Thanks.
Oskar Liljeblad (oskar@osk.mine.nu)
===
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static void handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *data)
{
printf("notified\n");
}
int main(void)
{
struct sigaction act;
int fd;
act.sa_sigaction = handler;
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
sigaction(SIGRTMIN, &act, NULL);
fd = open(".", O_RDONLY);
fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, SIGRTMIN);
fcntl(fd, F_NOTIFY, DN_ACCESS|DN_MULTISHOT);
while (1) {
pause();
if (fork() <= 0) exit(0);
wait(NULL);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-10 21:08 Oskar Liljeblad [this message]
2002-03-11 7:41 ` directory notifications lost after fork? Alex Riesen
2002-03-12 12:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-11 8:50 ` Oskar Liljeblad
2002-03-11 10:20 ` Alex Riesen
2002-03-11 10:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-03-12 1:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-12 2:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-03-12 4:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] <20020311122701.A9718@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com>
2002-03-11 19:34 ` Alex Riesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-12 1:47 Malte Starostik
2002-03-12 12:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-03-12 16:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-12 17:21 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020310210802.GA1695@oskar \
--to=oskar@osk.mine.nu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.