From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:17:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020416001749.GY23513@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020411.164134.85392767.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20020411.203823.67879801.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20020411.043614.02328218.davem@redhat.com> <200204111257.g3BCvOX10348@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20020411151616.A1239@wotan.suse.de>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:16:16PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:00:37PM -0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On 11 April 2002 09:36, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > No, you must block truncate operations on the file until the client
> > > ACK's the nfsd read request if you wish to use sendfile() with
> > > nfsd.
> >
> > Which shouldn't be a big performance problem unless I am unaware
> > of some real-life applications doing heavy truncates.
>
> Every unlink does a truncate. There are applications that delete files
> a lot.
Is this true at the filesystem level or only in memory? If so, I could
immagine that it would make it much harder to undelete a file when you don't
even know how big it was (file set to 0 size)...
Why is this required? Could someone say quickly (as I'm sure it's probably
quite complex) or point me to some references?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020410.190550.83626375.taka@valinux.co.jp.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-10 19:32 ` [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated Andi Kleen
2002-04-11 2:30 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 6:46 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 6:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 7:41 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 7:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 11:38 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-11 11:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-11 18:00 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-11 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-11 17:36 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-16 0:17 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2002-04-16 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-04-11 17:33 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-04-12 8:10 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-12 12:30 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-12 12:35 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-12 21:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-12 21:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-13 0:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-04-13 6:39 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-13 8:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-13 19:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-13 19:37 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-13 20:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-24 23:11 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-25 17:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-13 18:52 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-04-14 0:07 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-14 8:19 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-04-14 8:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-12 21:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-15 1:30 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-15 4:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 1:03 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-16 1:41 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-16 2:20 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-18 5:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-18 7:58 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-04-18 8:53 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19 3:21 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-19 9:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-20 7:47 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-25 12:37 ` Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR. Was " Terje Eggestad
2002-04-26 2:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-26 7:38 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 0:41 ` Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR David Schwartz
2002-04-29 8:06 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 8:44 ` David Schwartz
2002-04-29 10:03 ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-29 10:38 ` David Schwartz
2002-04-29 14:20 ` Terje Eggestad
[not found] ` <200204192128.QAA24592@popmail.austin.ibm.com>
2002-04-20 10:14 ` [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-20 15:49 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-04-10 10:12 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-10 17:55 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-04-12 11:10 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-04-13 9:40 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-10 10:05 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-04-10 10:05 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020416001749.GY23513@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.