Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

[Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:40:11AM -0400, Skip Ford wrote:
> That's only 1 aspect.  The frustrating part is bug reports mailed to the
> list getting a response of "oh, that's fixed in the latest bk tree."
> 
> That's happened a dozen times in the last week...no wonder non-bk users
> feel out of the loop.  I've been staring at the code for a lot of years
> and it's finally just starting to make sense to me, now by the time I see
> it the core hackers have moved on to something else.
> 
> Daily snapshots would be great.

We have hourly snapshots, thanks to the work David Woodhouse and
Rik van Riel did at a moments notice.  Does this satisfy your
concerns above?

I have a suspicion that the problem of conflicting obvious fixes
won't go away.

There's another interesting twist here... - I didn't see any of them on
linux-kernel.

<joke>
I'm a BK user!  GNU patches are being submitted behind my back without
discussion on linux-kernel.  I'm going to remove the SubmittingPatches
document!  It's harming discussion of patches on linux-kernel.
</joke>

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html