From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: elladan@eskimo.com, Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:07:26 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205141807.NAA71526@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> (raw)
>
> A second method was proposed as well - create a file with a hole in it,
> map it, then dirty the pages in the hole and exit. This would not
> require suid.
Actually, the allocation that fills the partition (and goes one over)
should fail. Even if that is only adding a block to the hole, it should
fail. Now if it DOES continue then you have found a bug since it
shouldn't do that.
> This is basically a documentation issue, unless someone wants to go fix
> it. I wouldn't bother myself - it's ext[23] only and not really very
> useful.
>
> The basic problem is this: the documentation states "This is intended to
> allow for the system to continue functioning even if non-priveleged
> users fill up all the space available to them." This states that it's a
> security feature. It does not work as intended - all users are
> privileged to do this - so the documentation should be updated.
There is nothing wrong with the documentation. Though it could have
additions to more clearly explain why. The feature can already be disabled.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 18:07 Jesse Pollard [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-14 19:29 [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 18:54 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 19:04 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-14 19:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 18:00 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 17:53 Jesse Pollard
2002-05-14 18:23 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 19:11 ` Alexander Viro
[not found] <791836807@toto.iv>
2002-05-12 22:04 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-12 22:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-13 4:22 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-13 4:51 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 16:23 Kasper Dupont
2002-05-12 16:42 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-12 17:34 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 18:15 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-12 18:37 ` Elladan
2002-05-12 19:02 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-05-12 19:04 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-13 17:09 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-13 17:52 ` Elladan
2002-05-13 17:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-14 16:22 ` Elladan
2002-05-14 16:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 17:47 ` Elladan
2002-05-14 18:51 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-15 19:48 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-15 20:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 15:40 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-05-14 15:56 ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-14 18:25 ` Kasper Dupont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205141807.NAA71526@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--to=pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil \
--cc=elladan@eskimo.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.