From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] iowait statistics
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:21:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020515162116.GE27957@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205151514.g4FFEmY13920@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205151310130.9490-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>> I think two patches for same kernel piece at the same time is
>> too many. Go ahead and code this if you want.
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:13:33PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> OK, here it is. Changes against yesterday's patch:
> 1) make sure idle time can never go backwards by incrementing
> the idle time in the timer interrupt too (surely we can
> take this overhead if we're idle anyway ;))
> 2) get_request_wait also raises nr_iowait_tasks (thanks akpm)
> This patch is against the latest 2.5 kernel from bk and
> pretty much untested. If you have the time, please test
> it and let me know if it works.
I'll take it for a spin on my 8-way HT box; I can remove enough of
the non-compiling device subsystems to get test boots & runs in there.
Cheers,
Bill
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] iowait statistics
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:21:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020515162116.GE27957@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205151310130.9490-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>> I think two patches for same kernel piece at the same time is
>> too many. Go ahead and code this if you want.
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:13:33PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> OK, here it is. Changes against yesterday's patch:
> 1) make sure idle time can never go backwards by incrementing
> the idle time in the timer interrupt too (surely we can
> take this overhead if we're idle anyway ;))
> 2) get_request_wait also raises nr_iowait_tasks (thanks akpm)
> This patch is against the latest 2.5 kernel from bk and
> pretty much untested. If you have the time, please test
> it and let me know if it works.
I'll take it for a spin on my 8-way HT box; I can remove enough of
the non-compiling device subsystems to get test boots & runs in there.
Cheers,
Bill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-15 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 1:19 [RFC][PATCH] iowait statistics Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 1:19 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-14 2:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-14 12:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 12:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 17:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 17:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 7:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-16 7:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-16 14:04 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-14 15:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-14 15:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-14 16:36 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 16:36 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-14 16:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-14 16:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 17:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 17:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 20:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 20:17 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 16:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 16:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 16:21 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-05-15 16:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 17:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 17:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 18:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 18:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:33 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 18:33 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 18:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 18:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 19:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-15 19:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-16 11:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 11:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 9:49 ` Leigh Brown
2002-05-16 14:51 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-16 16:44 ` Leigh Brown
2002-05-17 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-16 11:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 11:14 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 15:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 15:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-16 10:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-16 10:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-14 18:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-14 18:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-15 1:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-15 1:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 1:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-15 14:39 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020515162116.GE27957@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.