[parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[James Mc Parlane]

Does anyone please have info, or know where I can find info on the parisc2.0
calling convention under hpux and parisc-linux?

I am attempting to add parisc support to libffi.

Thankyou.

Re: [parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[Grant Grundler]

James Mc Parlane wrote:
> Does anyone please have info, or know where I can find info on the parisc2.0
> calling convention under hpux and parisc-linux?

There's several calling conventions that can run under PA2.0 architecture.
HPUX supports PA1.1 SOM and PA2.0 64-bit ELF.
The 64-bit ELF is the same for both OSs.
parisc-linux kernel has limited support for PA1.1 SOM but everything for
debian-hppa is built using PA1.1 ELF (32-bit).

I'm not aware of any authoritative, detailed documentation for PA1.1 ELF.
Since PA1.1 (32-bit) ELF is hack from the existing 64-bit ELF, 
You could start by looking at PA2.0 calling convention for HPUX.
Either docs.hp.com or www.parisc-linux.org should have that specification.
Otherwise, just write something in 'C' and see what gcc produces.

grant

Re: [parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[Randolph Chung]

> I'm not aware of any authoritative, detailed documentation for PA1.1 ELF.
> Since PA1.1 (32-bit) ELF is hack from the existing 64-bit ELF, 
> You could start by looking at PA2.0 calling convention for HPUX.
> Either docs.hp.com or www.parisc-linux.org should have that specification.
> Otherwise, just write something in 'C' and see what gcc produces.

 From what I have seen, the 32-bit elf conventions are quite similar to
 the 32-bit som conventions. the biggest difference i know off the top
 of my head is that we don't do fp argument relocation.

 http://www.parisc-linux.org/documentation/index.html has some good
 links for the 32-bit SOM and 64-bit ELF runtime architectures.

 randolph
--  
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/

Re: [parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[John David Anglin]

> > I'm not aware of any authoritative, detailed documentation for PA1.1 ELF.
> > Since PA1.1 (32-bit) ELF is hack from the existing 64-bit ELF, 
> > You could start by looking at PA2.0 calling convention for HPUX.
> > Either docs.hp.com or www.parisc-linux.org should have that specification.
> > Otherwise, just write something in 'C' and see what gcc produces.
> 
>  From what I have seen, the 32-bit elf conventions are quite similar to
>  the 32-bit som conventions. the biggest difference i know off the top
>  of my head is that we don't do fp argument relocation.

Yes, that's the main difference.  For the most part, argument relocation
does not affect the code generated except in special situations (e.g.,
varargs).  Further, there are no differences in the calling conventions
for PA1.0, PA1.1 and PA2.0 in either runtime.

For embedded products, you should be aware of TARGET_PORTABLE_RUNTIME.
This affects the type of branch used for calls.  It could be specified
under hpux or linux but I have no idea whether it would work.

I have wondered if parisc-linux actually supports the PA2.0 architecture
in the ELF32 runtime.  I think that's there is more in the compiler that
could be done to take advantage of the 64-bit general registers and 64-bit
operations available under PA2.0.

There are some subtle differences between the SOM and ELF32 runtimes that
arise because of the different capabilities of the linkers.  Long calls
are more likely to be needed with the GNU linker because it places stubs
at the beginning of translation units unless you compile with
-ffunction-sections.

There are differences in the assembly language output from the compiler
for hpux and linux.  These mainly involve different directives.  The linux
directives are similar to those for the i386 linux port.

You will probably need to understand stub generation to implement libffi
if I recall correctly.

Hpux uses a segmented memory model.  Linux uses a flat model.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)

Re: [parisc-linux] parsic function calling convention

[Carlos O'Donell Jr.]

> You will probably need to understand stub generation to implement libffi
> if I recall correctly.
> 
> Hpux uses a segmented memory model.  Linux uses a flat model.
> 
> Dave

Last I remember there was someone porting avcall.
They might be a good resource.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2002/debian-hppa-200203/msg00073.html

Here is some general discussion on fp passing:
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/hypermail/parisc-linux/8277.html

c.