From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Subject: Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:49:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D2BF3CC.3040409@users.sf.net>
On Wed, Jul 10 2002, Thomas Tonino wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> >Seriously, if you have that kind of problems, take the -aa kernel and use
> >it.
> >I use it regularly and it behaves as one would expect, and fast.
> >And please, report your results...
>
> I run a 2 cpu server with 16 disks and around 5 megabytes of writes a
> second. With plain 2.4.18 (using the feral.com qlogic driver) and 2GB
> ram, this seemed okay. Upgrading to 4GB ram slowed the system down, and
> normal shell commands became quite unresponsive with 4GB.
>
> So we built a second server, with 2.4.19-pre9-aa2 using the qlogic
> driver in the kernel. That driver needs patching, as it will otherwise
> get stuck in a 'no handle slots' condition. Used a patch that I posted
> to linux-scsi a while ago.
That's probably not just a mm issue, if you use stock 2.4.18 with 4GB
ram you will spend oodles of time bounce buffering i/o. 2.4.19-pre9-aa2
includes the block-highmem stuff, which enables direct-to-highmem i/o,
if you enabled the CONFIG_HIGHIO option.
In short, not an apples-to-apples comparison :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 22:11 Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:37 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 22:50 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-08 23:58 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-09 10:48 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+ again? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-10 16:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801113124.GA755@mail.muni.cz>
[not found] ` <20020801140348.GM1132@dualathlon.random>
[not found] ` <20020801141940.GB755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 15:39 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.19rc3aa4 once again? Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801220143.GC755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 22:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 8:43 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 8:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-07-10 13:52 ` Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 16:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 12:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-08 23:04 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 23:27 ` khromy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttonino@users.sf.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.