All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sf.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Subject: Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:52:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2C3C24.8090402@users.sf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de

Jens Axboe wrote:

> That's probably not just a mm issue, if you use stock 2.4.18 with 4GB
> ram you will spend oodles of time bounce buffering i/o. 2.4.19-pre9-aa2
> includes the block-highmem stuff, which enables direct-to-highmem i/o,
> if you enabled the CONFIG_HIGHIO option.

Indeed, highio seemed a feature I wanted, so I enabled it. But in the 
'stuck' state on the 2 GB 2.4.18 machine, the load is 75 while there is 
no disk activity according to iostat, but shells perform slowly anyway 
and the CPU is idle. A reboot command doesn't work, but logging in over 
ssh is still possible.

> In short, not an apples-to-apples comparison :-)

I agree a lot has changed in that kernel. And I wanted the O(1) 
scheduler as well, as I expect a lot of processes on the server.

The 2.4.18 behaviour stays strange: the server has a fairly constant 
workload, but the cpu load, normally averaging around 2, sometimes rises 
to 75 in about an hour, and usually the load also winds down again.

None of the strange effects above have been noticed on 2.4.19-pre9-aa2. 
BTW, the qlogic patch is great in preventing the handle slots issue.


Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-10 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08 22:11 Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:37 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 22:50   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:58     ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-08 23:58       ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-09 10:48       ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+ again? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-10 16:34         ` Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found]           ` <20020801113124.GA755@mail.muni.cz>
     [not found]             ` <20020801140348.GM1132@dualathlon.random>
     [not found]               ` <20020801141940.GB755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 15:39                 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.19rc3aa4 once again? Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found]                   ` <20020801220143.GC755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 22:14                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10  8:43       ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10  8:49         ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-10 13:52           ` Thomas Tonino [this message]
2002-07-10 16:41             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 12:34         ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-08 23:04     ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 23:27 ` khromy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D2C3C24.8090402@users.sf.net \
    --to=ttonino@users.sf.net \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ttonino@users.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.