From: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sf.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Tonino <ttonino@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Subject: Re: Terrible VM in 2.4.11+?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:52:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2C3C24.8090402@users.sf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020710084904.GH3185@suse.de
Jens Axboe wrote:
> That's probably not just a mm issue, if you use stock 2.4.18 with 4GB
> ram you will spend oodles of time bounce buffering i/o. 2.4.19-pre9-aa2
> includes the block-highmem stuff, which enables direct-to-highmem i/o,
> if you enabled the CONFIG_HIGHIO option.
Indeed, highio seemed a feature I wanted, so I enabled it. But in the
'stuck' state on the 2 GB 2.4.18 machine, the load is 75 while there is
no disk activity according to iostat, but shells perform slowly anyway
and the CPU is idle. A reboot command doesn't work, but logging in over
ssh is still possible.
> In short, not an apples-to-apples comparison :-)
I agree a lot has changed in that kernel. And I wanted the O(1)
scheduler as well, as I expect a lot of processes on the server.
The 2.4.18 behaviour stays strange: the server has a fairly constant
workload, but the cpu load, normally averaging around 2, sometimes rises
to 75 in about an hour, and usually the load also winds down again.
None of the strange effects above have been noticed on 2.4.19-pre9-aa2.
BTW, the qlogic patch is great in preventing the handle slots issue.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-08 22:11 Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:37 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 22:50 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-08 22:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-07-08 23:58 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-09 10:48 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+ again? Lukas Hejtmanek
2002-07-10 16:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801113124.GA755@mail.muni.cz>
[not found] ` <20020801140348.GM1132@dualathlon.random>
[not found] ` <20020801141940.GB755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 15:39 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.19rc3aa4 once again? Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] ` <20020801220143.GC755@mail.muni.cz>
2002-08-01 22:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 8:43 ` Terrible VM in 2.4.11+? Thomas Tonino
2002-07-10 8:49 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-10 13:52 ` Thomas Tonino [this message]
2002-07-10 16:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-07-10 12:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-08 23:04 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-07-08 23:27 ` khromy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D2C3C24.8090402@users.sf.net \
--to=ttonino@users.sf.net \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttonino@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.