From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:00:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020717080037.GA28190@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020717001032.GI358@codesourcery.com>
On 2002-07-16T17:10:32,
Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> said:
> Therefore, if you've checked the return value of fsync, there's no
> point in checking the subsequent close; and if you don't care to call
> fsync, the close return value is useless since it isn't guaranteed to
> detect anything.
There is _always_ a point in checking a return value of non void functions.
EOD.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
--- Gregory F. Pfister
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-17 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020712162306$aa7d@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/20020712162306$aa7d@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
2002-07-15 15:22 ` [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 17:31 ` Chris Mason
2002-07-15 18:33 ` Matthias Andree
[not found] ` <20020715173337$acad@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/20020715173337$acad@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
2002-07-15 19:13 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 20:55 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 21:23 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 21:38 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 12:31 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 15:53 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 19:26 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 19:38 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 23:22 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) Zack Weinberg
2002-07-17 1:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-16 23:52 ` close return value David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-17 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 1:05 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 11:51 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-17 17:23 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-07-20 8:00 ` Florian Weimer
2002-07-20 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-26 0:06 ` EFAULT vs. SIGSEGV [was Re: close return value] Pavel Machek
2002-07-26 14:01 ` (no subject) Alexis Deruelle
[not found] ` <mailman.1026868201.10433.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-07-18 0:01 ` close return value Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-18 0:10 ` Thunder from the hill
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/200207180001.g6I015f02681@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
2002-07-18 14:42 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-18 15:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 15:32 ` Sandy Harris
2002-07-18 23:47 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-07-19 16:12 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-19 16:24 ` Joseph Malicki
2002-07-19 18:48 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-19 19:25 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-07-19 19:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-19 19:45 ` Joseph Malicki
2002-07-19 19:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-20 18:25 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-07-20 23:06 ` Sandy Harris
2002-07-20 14:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-07-18 20:09 ` Hildo.Biersma
2002-07-18 23:55 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-19 11:31 ` Hildo.Biersma
2002-07-19 16:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-23 22:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-17 0:10 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) Zack Weinberg
2002-07-17 1:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-17 18:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-07-22 16:42 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-07-17 8:00 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2002-07-17 15:49 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 2:22 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 2:54 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 3:00 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 3:10 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 3:31 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 4:17 ` Stevie O
2002-07-17 4:38 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 14:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-07-17 16:49 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 22:07 ` Elladan
2002-07-18 9:48 ` Ketil Froyn
2002-07-17 17:17 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-07-17 17:51 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-17 7:34 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks Kai Henningsen
2002-07-15 21:59 ` Ketil Froyn
2002-07-15 23:08 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-07-16 12:33 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-15 21:58 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 21:14 ` Chris Mason
2002-07-15 21:31 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 22:12 ` Richard A Nelson
2002-07-16 1:02 ` Lawrence Greenfield
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/200207160102.g6G12BiH022986@lin2.andrew.cmu.edu>
2002-07-16 1:43 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-16 1:56 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 12:47 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 21:09 ` James Antill
2002-07-16 12:35 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 7:07 ` Dax Kelson
[not found] <fa.lfdnrtv.5h8i1j@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.i1e82rv.1digoa4@ifi.uio.no>
2002-07-17 3:46 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) Russ Allbery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020717080037.GA28190@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.