From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
junkio@cox.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] strlen("literal string") -> (sizeof("literal string")-1)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:10:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020829031008.T7920@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020829015407.7DFCE2C0D9@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:29:04PM +1000
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:29:04PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <20020829032642.GA9201@nevyn.them.org> you write:
> > Also disagree; besides, the evidence implies that Keith is wrong. GCC
> > 2.95.3:
>
> i386, m68k, s390 and s390x define inline strlen() versions, so they
> are don't optimize strlen("literal").
>
> This premature optimization should probably be fixed,
Well, IMHO at least for the more recent GCC versions kernel
should leave the job to GCC (ie. either just prototype str* functions,
or define them to __builtin_str* variants).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-29 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.iks3ohv.1flge08@ifi.uio.no>
2002-08-28 21:31 ` [TRIVIAL] strlen("literal string") -> (sizeof("literal string")-1) junkio
2002-08-28 21:55 ` Jim Treadway
2002-08-29 3:09 ` Rusty Russell
2002-08-29 3:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29 6:29 ` Rusty Russell
2002-08-29 7:10 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2002-08-29 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-29 20:38 ` Denis Zaitsev
2002-09-06 12:53 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <fa.lrmcokv.1q28k2s@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.pm2g4iv.k0s9jg@ifi.uio.no>
2002-08-29 0:49 ` junio
2002-08-29 3:15 ` Rusty Russell
2002-08-29 15:39 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-29 15:48 ` Dave Jones
2002-08-30 3:50 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <20020829031008.T7920@devserv.devel.redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208290955280.2070-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-08-29 17:23 ` Andi Kleen
2002-08-29 17:51 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-29 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020829031008.T7920@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.