From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Linux Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>
Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_hash() problem
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 10:39:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020905044436.0772A2C0DF@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Sep 2002 15:26:26 +0200." <20020904152626.A11438@wotan.suse.de>
In message <20020904152626.A11438@wotan.suse.de> you write:
> > I think the hash function should be fixed, not the possible choice of
> > hash sizes, if that is at feasible.
> I also agree with Martin that it is better to fix the hash function in
> this case. Restricting to magic hash table sizes looks like a bad hack.
This work is already done:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/patches/Netfilter/conntrack_hashing.patch.gz
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-05 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-04 12:33 ip_conntrack_hash() problem Martin Wilck
2002-09-04 12:56 ` Harald Welte
2002-09-04 13:24 ` Martin Wilck
2002-09-04 13:26 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-05 0:39 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-09-05 6:21 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-09-05 6:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05 6:33 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-09-05 6:32 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05 6:32 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05 6:39 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-09-05 6:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-05 13:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-05 11:14 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-05 6:51 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-09-05 7:19 ` Martin Wilck
2002-09-05 11:15 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-05 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-05 17:55 ` Patrick Schaaf
2002-09-05 18:24 ` Martin Wilck
2002-10-11 3:51 ` Zheng Weibin
2002-09-05 8:19 ` Harald Welte
2002-09-04 13:40 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020905044436.0772A2C0DF@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bof@bof.de \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.