From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lord@sgi.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:45:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020930194529.A15138@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209301835190.18614-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:38:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> see the workqueues patch i posted a couple of minutes ago. Does this solve
> XFS's problems?
Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An
totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS.
> why is it ugly? I can add a simple interface to the workqueues subsystem
> that will bind the XFS worker threads to given sets of CPUs. That should
> give you per-CPU workqueues, with separate per-CPU locking.
That would also work, but would require more code in XFS than my
above suggestion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-30 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 17:52 [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 19:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 19:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-30 12:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 14:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-29 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 21:45 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 3:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 4:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01 5:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 8:00 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 5:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-03 7:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2002-09-30 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 0:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020930194529.A15138@sgi.com \
--to=hch@sgi.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.