From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lord@sgi.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
cw@f00f.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:43:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020930204320.A21715@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209301911180.21901-100000@localhost.localdomain>; from mingo@elte.hu on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:12:54PM +0200
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:12:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An
> > totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS.
>
> you can create as many queues as you wish - one per CPU for example. Or
> one per mounted fs per CPU.
Yeah. But adding a create_workqueue_per_cpu that has one queue and thead
per cpu to which queue_work dispatches would centralize the code needed
to manage that in one place instead of duplicating it over and over.
Sure both works, but IMHO hiding it behind a nice abstraction is much
better.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-30 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 17:52 [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 18:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-29 19:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-29 18:54 ` Dave Jones
2002-09-29 19:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 4:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-30 12:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-30 14:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-09-29 19:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-30 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 21:45 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 3:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 4:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-01 5:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 8:00 ` george anzinger
2002-10-01 5:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-03 7:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-30 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-30 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-30 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 0:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020930204320.A21715@sgi.com \
--to=hch@sgi.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.