* [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations
@ 2002-10-30 11:32 Bradley M Alexander
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bradley M Alexander @ 2002-10-30 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:02:24AM -0500, Bradley Alexander wrote:
> > > There might be a slight chance to get it back, if you have an LVM
> > > metadata backup at hand (/etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf) and use vgcfgrestore
> > > to restore it to the physical volume.
> >
> > I tried this and when I tried listing the file, I got the same
> > consistency error message:
> >
> > [defiant /etc/lvmconf]# vgcfgrestore -f /etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf.2.old -l
> > -n vg00
> > vgcfgrestore -- ERROR "vg_cfgrestore(): pv_check_consistency" restoring
> > volume group "vg00"
>
> "pvcreate -ff ..." on the PV first.
Okay, I tried this, it was successful
> Well, if the vgcfgrestore brings your VG back it is still questionable what
> data is toasted. If any the move won't help either and you want to
> go for your backup media :(
The issue I am running into is that when I try to rebuild the lvm from
scratch, I have been getting some strange errors. The base directories of
the system are in / (including /, /usr, /lib, etc). LVM 1.0.5 is compiled
into the kernel, not as modules.
I did the pvcreate -ff on each PV, then did a vgcreate vg00, and activated.
Messages kept popping up about "Can't find module /dev/lvm" and "Can't find
module /dev/vg00" and "invalidate: busy buffer". I finally got it to create
the vg, created my partitions, then started restoring from backup. After over
an hour of restoring, I had everything back to pretty much where I wanted it.
Did a CTRL-D to go back to multiuser mode, and it wound up rebooting. When it
came back up, the vgchange -a y vg00 told me that vg00 did not exist. How
can I rebuild my volume group and get the data to stay on the machine?
Sorry for the vagueness of the post, but I am not sitting in front of the
machine, and since the home directories do not exist, I can't ssh in to get
the exact messages. But the pvs, lvs and partitions were in place, why is
this not persistent through a reboot?
Thanks,
--Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations
@ 2002-10-25 23:56 Bradley M Alexander
2002-10-28 3:11 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bradley M Alexander @ 2002-10-25 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
I have a machine which is running lvm, though not on the root filesystem:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 2626536 1590228 1036308 61% /
/dev/vg00/lv_tmp 204788 33008 171780 17% /tmp
/dev/vg00/lv_var 1572812 834604 738208 54% /var
/dev/vg00/lv_home 2621356 1335196 1286160 51% /home
/dev/vg00/lv_usrlocal
1572812 1216152 356660 78% /usr/local
/dev/vg00/lv_opt 524268 272348 251920 52% /opt
/dev/vg00/lv_backup 10485436 8017728 2467708 77% /backup
/dev/vg00/lv_video 11533980 5271576 6262404 46% /usr/local/video
/dev/vg00/lv_archive 18873788 17288044 1585744 92% /archive
This machine has three 30GB drives on it. Drives 2 and 3 (/dev/hdc and
/dev/hde)
I have a separate drive with Win98. Two nights ago, I booted into Windows
to defrag the drive on my Archos mp3 player using Norton. When I fired up
Norton, I misread the message and ended up letting Norton try to find the
partition table, thinking it was the Archos. After about a minute without
seeing the Archos' drive light flicker, I found that something was amiss.
It was cabbaging the LVM drives. /dev/hdc shows the following information
in a pvscan:
pvscan -- physical volume "/dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc" is not
active
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc
VG Name
PV Size 8.03 GB / NOT usable 1.99 TB [LVM: 3.85 GB]
PV# 0
PV Status NOT available
Allocatable yes
Cur LV 260964353
PE Size (KByte) 2097151
Total PE 4255186944
Free PE 4255186029
Allocated PE 915
PV UUID JXhNLv-TtpF-62Lg-CoIs-TMLT-Xg9L-GFfndV
System Id defiant1008649744
Since it was on a Promise controller, which locked up due to the filesystem
damage, I moved the drive on hde to hdd to get it to boot. LVM sees the
data on the PVs. I want to move the extents off of the damaged drives,
starting with hdc. However, when I attempt to do so, I get a message about
the PV being in an inconsistent state:
[defiant /home/storm]# pvmove /dev/hdc
pvmove -- ERROR "pv_check_consistency(): current LV" physical volume
"/dev/hdc" is inconsistent
The same occurs when I try to pvmove /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc.
I would like to move the PEs off of the damaged drive and rebuild it, then
move the data back. Is there a way to fix the PV on that particular drive
so I can move the data off (there should be enough free PEs on the other
two drives) and rebuild the drive?
Thanks,
--
--Brad
============================================================================
Bradley M. Alexander | storm [at] debian.org
Debian Developer, Security Engineer | storm [at] tux.org
Debian/GNU Linux Developer | Visit the 99th VFS website at:
99th VFS 'Tuskegee Airmen' | http://99thvfs-ta.org
============================================================================
Key fingerprints:
DSA 0x54434E65: 37F6 BCA6 621D 920C E02E E3C8 73B2 C019 5443 4E65
RSA 0xC3BCBA91: 3F 0E 26 C1 90 14 AD 0A C8 9C F0 93 75 A0 01 34
============================================================================
The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations
2002-10-25 23:56 Bradley M Alexander
@ 2002-10-28 3:11 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28 7:03 ` Bradley Alexander
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2002-10-28 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Bradley,
looks like Norton defrag toasted your physical volume :(
There might be a slight chance to get it back, if you have an LVM
metadata backup at hand (/etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf) and use vgcfgrestore
to restore it to the physical volume.
But I guess Norton damaged more than just the LVM metadata area which sits
at the beginning of the drive.
You should try restoring the metadata though.
Hopefully you've got an actual backup of your logical volumes!
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:55:58AM -0400, Bradley M Alexander wrote:
> I have a machine which is running lvm, though not on the root filesystem:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2 2626536 1590228 1036308 61% /
> /dev/vg00/lv_tmp 204788 33008 171780 17% /tmp
> /dev/vg00/lv_var 1572812 834604 738208 54% /var
> /dev/vg00/lv_home 2621356 1335196 1286160 51% /home
> /dev/vg00/lv_usrlocal
> 1572812 1216152 356660 78% /usr/local
> /dev/vg00/lv_opt 524268 272348 251920 52% /opt
> /dev/vg00/lv_backup 10485436 8017728 2467708 77% /backup
> /dev/vg00/lv_video 11533980 5271576 6262404 46% /usr/local/video
> /dev/vg00/lv_archive 18873788 17288044 1585744 92% /archive
>
> This machine has three 30GB drives on it. Drives 2 and 3 (/dev/hdc and
> /dev/hde)
>
> I have a separate drive with Win98. Two nights ago, I booted into Windows
> to defrag the drive on my Archos mp3 player using Norton. When I fired up
> Norton, I misread the message and ended up letting Norton try to find the
> partition table, thinking it was the Archos. After about a minute without
> seeing the Archos' drive light flicker, I found that something was amiss.
> It was cabbaging the LVM drives. /dev/hdc shows the following information
> in a pvscan:
>
> pvscan -- physical volume "/dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc" is not
> active
> --- Physical volume ---
> PV Name /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc
> VG Name
> PV Size 8.03 GB / NOT usable 1.99 TB [LVM: 3.85 GB]
> PV# 0
> PV Status NOT available
> Allocatable yes
> Cur LV 260964353
> PE Size (KByte) 2097151
> Total PE 4255186944
> Free PE 4255186029
> Allocated PE 915
> PV UUID JXhNLv-TtpF-62Lg-CoIs-TMLT-Xg9L-GFfndV
> System Id defiant1008649744
>
> Since it was on a Promise controller, which locked up due to the filesystem
> damage, I moved the drive on hde to hdd to get it to boot. LVM sees the
> data on the PVs. I want to move the extents off of the damaged drives,
> starting with hdc. However, when I attempt to do so, I get a message about
> the PV being in an inconsistent state:
>
> [defiant /home/storm]# pvmove /dev/hdc
> pvmove -- ERROR "pv_check_consistency(): current LV" physical volume
> "/dev/hdc" is inconsistent
>
> The same occurs when I try to pvmove /dev/ide/host0/bus1/target0/lun0/disc.
> I would like to move the PEs off of the damaged drive and rebuild it, then
> move the data back. Is there a way to fix the PV on that particular drive
> so I can move the data off (there should be enough free PEs on the other
> two drives) and rebuild the drive?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> --Brad
> ============================================================================
> Bradley M. Alexander | storm [at] debian.org
> Debian Developer, Security Engineer | storm [at] tux.org
> Debian/GNU Linux Developer | Visit the 99th VFS website at:
> 99th VFS 'Tuskegee Airmen' | http://99thvfs-ta.org
> ============================================================================
> Key fingerprints:
> DSA 0x54434E65: 37F6 BCA6 621D 920C E02E E3C8 73B2 C019 5443 4E65
> RSA 0xC3BCBA91: 3F 0E 26 C1 90 14 AD 0A C8 9C F0 93 75 A0 01 34
> ============================================================================
> The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations
2002-10-28 3:11 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
@ 2002-10-28 7:03 ` Bradley Alexander
2002-10-28 9:52 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bradley Alexander @ 2002-10-28 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 04:08, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> Bradley,
>
> looks like Norton defrag toasted your physical volume :(
Yep.
> There might be a slight chance to get it back, if you have an LVM
> metadata backup at hand (/etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf) and use vgcfgrestore
> to restore it to the physical volume.
I tried this and when I tried listing the file, I got the same
consistency error message:
[defiant /etc/lvmconf]# vgcfgrestore -f /etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf.2.old -l
-n vg00
vgcfgrestore -- ERROR "vg_cfgrestore(): pv_check_consistency" restoring
volume group "vg00"
vg00.conf.2.old should be the one immediately prior to the "incident".
When I tried an actual restore, it groused about changing an active
volume group, so I guess I'll go single-user and try it again.
> But I guess Norton damaged more than just the LVM metadata area which sits
> at the beginning of the drive.
> You should try restoring the metadata though.
Not knowing what Norton has cabbaged, I would be happy if I could just
move the active extents from the damaged volume to another one long
enough to remobe, rebuild and reactivate it.
> Hopefully you've got an actual backup of your logical volumes!
I'm using the one prior to the drive getting nortoned. :)
--
--Brad
============================================================================
Bradley M. Alexander | storm [at] debian.org
Debian Developer, Security Engineer | storm [at] tux.org
Debian/GNU Linux Developer | Visit the 99th VFS website at:
99th VFS 'Tuskegee Airmen' | http://99thvfs-ta.org
============================================================================
Key fingerprints:
DSA 0x54434E65: 37F6 BCA6 621D 920C E02E E3C8 73B2 C019 5443 4E65
RSA 0xC3BCBA91: 3F 0E 26 C1 90 14 AD 0A C8 9C F0 93 75 A0 01 34
============================================================================
If guns are outlawed, can we use swords?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations
2002-10-28 7:03 ` Bradley Alexander
@ 2002-10-28 9:52 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2002-10-28 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:02:24AM -0500, Bradley Alexander wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 04:08, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
> >
> > Bradley,
> >
> > looks like Norton defrag toasted your physical volume :(
>
> Yep.
>
> > There might be a slight chance to get it back, if you have an LVM
> > metadata backup at hand (/etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf) and use vgcfgrestore
> > to restore it to the physical volume.
>
> I tried this and when I tried listing the file, I got the same
> consistency error message:
>
> [defiant /etc/lvmconf]# vgcfgrestore -f /etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf.2.old -l
> -n vg00
> vgcfgrestore -- ERROR "vg_cfgrestore(): pv_check_consistency" restoring
> volume group "vg00"
"pvcreate -ff ..." on the PV first.
>
> vg00.conf.2.old should be the one immediately prior to the "incident".
>
> When I tried an actual restore, it groused about changing an active
> volume group, so I guess I'll go single-user and try it again.
>
> > But I guess Norton damaged more than just the LVM metadata area which sits
> > at the beginning of the drive.
> > You should try restoring the metadata though.
>
> Not knowing what Norton has cabbaged, I would be happy if I could just
> move the active extents from the damaged volume to another one long
> enough to remobe, rebuild and reactivate it.
Well, if the vgcfgrestore brings your VG back it is still questionable what
data is toasted. If any the move won't help either and you want to
go for your backup media :(
>
> > Hopefully you've got an actual backup of your logical volumes!
>
> I'm using the one prior to the drive getting nortoned. :)
>
> --
> --Brad
> ============================================================================
> Bradley M. Alexander | storm [at] debian.org
> Debian Developer, Security Engineer | storm [at] tux.org
> Debian/GNU Linux Developer | Visit the 99th VFS website at:
> 99th VFS 'Tuskegee Airmen' | http://99thvfs-ta.org
> ============================================================================
> Key fingerprints:
> DSA 0x54434E65: 37F6 BCA6 621D 920C E02E E3C8 73B2 C019 5443 4E65
> RSA 0xC3BCBA91: 3F 0E 26 C1 90 14 AD 0A C8 9C F0 93 75 A0 01 34
> ============================================================================
> If guns are outlawed, can we use swords?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-30 11:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-30 11:32 [linux-lvm] Repairing LVM installations Bradley M Alexander
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 23:56 Bradley M Alexander
2002-10-28 3:11 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28 7:03 ` Bradley Alexander
2002-10-28 9:52 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.