Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest

[Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>On Sat, Nov 09 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> >You're showing a big shift in behaviour between 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-rc1.
>> >Maybe it doesn't translate to worsened interactivity.  Needs more
>> >testing and anaysis.
>>
>> Sounds fair enough. My resources are exhausted though. Someone else have
>> any thoughts?
>
>Try setting lower elevator passover values. Something ala
>
># elvtune -r 64 /dev/hda
>
>(or whatever your drive is)

Heres some more data:

io_load:
Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.4.20-rc1 [2]          1142.2  6       90      10      16.00
2420rc1r64 [3]          575.0   12      43      10      8.05

That's it then. Should I run a family of different values and if so over what 
range?

Cheers,
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9zQkXF6dfvkL3i1gRAggJAKCOAWzrTxFlnPbOftzMAXPnvI7KVQCfWqUC
iDVmD1UcPDNPWCfQmlBF9yk=
=Q299
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----