From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:48:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021111154802.GF30193@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021111140920.GA838@suse.de>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 03:09:20PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> latency view point. This is also why the 2.5 deadline io scheduler is
> far superior in this area.
going in function of time is even better of course, but just assuming
bytes to be a linear function of time would be a good start, it depends
if you want to backport the deadline I/O scheduler to 2.4 or not. I
think going in terms of bytes would be simpler for 2.4. We're going to
use 2.4 for at least one more year in some production environment, so I
think it could make sense to address this, at least to be a function of
bytes if not of time.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-09 2:00 [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{18,19{-ck9},20rc1{-aa1}} with contest Con Kolivas
2002-11-09 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-09 3:26 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-09 4:15 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-09 5:12 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-09 11:21 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-09 13:09 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-09 13:35 ` Stephen Lord
2002-11-09 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-09 21:12 ` Arador
2002-11-10 2:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-09 21:53 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-10 10:09 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-10 16:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-11 4:26 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-10 10:12 ` Kjartan Maraas
2002-11-10 10:17 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-10 16:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-09 11:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-10 2:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-10 3:56 ` Matt Reppert
2002-11-10 9:58 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-10 10:06 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-10 16:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-10 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-10 19:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-10 20:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-10 20:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-10 21:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-11 1:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-11 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 4:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-11 4:22 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 4:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-11 5:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 5:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-11 7:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-11 13:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-11 13:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-11 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-11 15:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-11-11 15:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-10 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 1:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-09 3:44 Dieter Nützel
2002-11-09 3:54 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-09 4:02 ` Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021111154802.GF30193@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.