Re: 'pImage' and 'uImage' targets

Re: 'pImage' and 'uImage' targets

[Marius Groeger]

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote:

> Next, is it necessary to have both targets, as they produce the same
> exact output?  I can see this for 2.4 since I'm sure both work in 2.4
> and both have insturctions says to use {u,p}Image.  But will the PPCBoot

Since the U-Boot now contains our port to several ARM platforms and
the i386 port is more than upcoming, we would also need those targets
in the corresponding arch trees as well. Now how are we going to
handle _that_ without duplicating Make-code/scripts?

Regards,
Marius

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marius Groeger           SYSGO Real-Time Solutions AG       mgroeger@sysgo.de
Software Engineering     Embedded and Real-Time Software    www.sysgo.de
Voice: +49-6136-9948-0   Am Pfaffenstein 14                 www.osek.de
FAX:   +49-6136-9948-10  55270 Klein-Winternheim, Germany   www.elinos.com


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: 'pImage' and 'uImage' targets

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 05:05:01PM +0100, Marius Groeger wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Next, is it necessary to have both targets, as they produce the same
> > exact output?  I can see this for 2.4 since I'm sure both work in 2.4
> > and both have insturctions says to use {u,p}Image.  But will the PPCBoot
>
> Since the U-Boot now contains our port to several ARM platforms and
> the i386 port is more than upcoming, we would also need those targets
> in the corresponding arch trees as well. Now how are we going to
> handle _that_ without duplicating Make-code/scripts?

Convincing Linus / Marcelo to put the script into scripts/ and then
getting the arch maintainers to add uImage targets?

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Readonly __ioremap()?

[Joakim Tjernlund]

Hi

I want to create a readonly __ioremap() mapping which is cacheble and I unsure
what flag I should use to __ioremap() to do that.

So far I using __ioremap(flash_addr, flash_size, 0). Reading include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h
does not help me much.

I am using a mpc860 CPU.

 Jocke


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/