All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
	Bishop Brock <bcbrock@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
	linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-pm-devel] Re: IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:00:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021203200019.GD1340@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1038940024.1249.190.camel@granite.austin.ibm.com>

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:27:03PM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 11:57, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 18:46, Bishop Brock wrote:
> > > IBM and MontaVista have initiated a joint project to develop a
> > > dynamic power management control and policy mechanism for Linux
> > > for processors supporting dynamic voltage and frequency scaling.

Great!

> > > A paper describing the proposal can be obtained from
> > > 
> > > http://www.research.ibm.com/arl/projects/dpm.html
> > > 
> > > A working prototype of the proposed framework for
> > > the IBM PowerPC 405LP processor exists and will be made
> > > public in the near future.
> > 
> > any idea if/how this will fit into the existing cross platform cpufreq
> > framework ?
> 
> It subsumes it, similar to Dominik's ideas in "[RFC] Dynamic Frequency
> and Voltage Scaling Infrastructure" (on the cpufreq list). The idea is
> that you want scaling events to be generated by the kernel rather than
> only scaling on userland input. The paper (and Dominik's mail) give you
> some ideas of when and why...

So, will it basically be a "policy governor" as described in my "[RFC]" mail?
Or does it need other enhancements in the cpufreq core? 

BTW, have you noticed the premilinary patch I which implements most of the 
DVS infrastructure mentioned in my mail to the cpufreq list yesterday?

	Dominik

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-03 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-03 17:46 IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project Bishop Brock
2002-12-03 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-12-03 18:27   ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-03 20:00     ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2002-12-03 20:31       ` Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-05  8:18   ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-12-03 18:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-03 18:45 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-04  3:34 [Linux-pm-devel] " Bishop Brock
2002-12-05  8:48 ` Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021203200019.GD1340@brodo.de \
    --to=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=bcbrock@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=hollis@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.