From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
Cc: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se, acurtis@directvinternet.com,
Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>, Matt Porter <porter@cox.net>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:56:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021211145658.GA19456@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DF70C55.3010709@intracom.gr>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
> I think it's safe to assume that there is large amount of confussion at
> this subject.
Definatly.
> FWIW I dislike the use of iopa(), and I would be forced to duplicate the
> code of
> consistent_alloc() class of functions in my tree.
Why would you have to duplicate the consistent_alloc code? It is not
tied to PCI, really.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-11 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 14:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-06 22:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 0:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-09 9:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 3:52 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 8:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11 9:58 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 3:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2002-12-11 15:07 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 3:41 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12 8:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 8:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12 8:37 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-13 4:12 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 6:09 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13 7:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 4:08 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53 ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56 ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07 0:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021211145658.GA19456@opus.bloom.county \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=acurtis@directvinternet.com \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=panto@intracom.gr \
--cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=porter@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.