* [BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch
@ 2002-12-13 4:59 Aniruddha M Marathe
2002-12-13 5:02 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aniruddha M Marathe @ 2002-12-13 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Josh Fryman
Hi,
Josh, please comment on the format.
Here is a short summary of performance of 2.5.51 mm2 as compared to 2.5.51 mm1 on LM bench. Figures below are 'median' of 5 results.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For detailed results, please mail me so that I will send results individually.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.5.51 mm1 2.5.51-mm2
==================================================================================
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
1. Null call time decreased a bit. 0.46 0.44
2. increase in time for fork proc 362 403
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better
1. 2p/16K ctxsw 5.01 4.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
1. UDP 33 35
2. TCP 122 125
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
1. 10K file delete 57 59
2. mmap latency 615 651
==================================================================================
Rest of the results are not much different.
Regards,
Aniruddha Marathe
WIPRO technologies, India
Aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com
+91-80-5502001 extn 5092
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch
2002-12-13 4:59 [BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch Aniruddha M Marathe
@ 2002-12-13 5:02 ` Larry McVoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Larry McVoy @ 2002-12-13 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aniruddha M Marathe; +Cc: linux-kernel, Josh Fryman
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:29:11AM +0530, Aniruddha M Marathe wrote:
> Hi,
> Josh, please comment on the format.
Well, I'm not josh, but what is wrong with the default LMbench output
format? It's much easier to see what's going on than what you posted.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-13 4:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-13 4:59 [BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch Aniruddha M Marathe
2002-12-13 5:02 ` Larry McVoy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.