From: Tracy R Reed <treed@ultraviolet.org>
To: Tupshin Harper <tupshin@tupshin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:29:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021214212914.A8682@ultraviolet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DEFB275.9000807@tupshin.com>; from tupshin@tupshin.com on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:25PM -0800
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:25PM -0800, Tupshin Harper spake thusly:
> I'm not at all opposed to capabilities, but I don't believe they come
> close to obviating ACLs. It also doesn't seem ACLs and capabilities are
> in any kind of conflict. Why could we not have both?
SE Linux seems to give you both.
--
Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-15 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-05 2:00 is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Ed Vance
2002-12-05 12:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 12:54 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 13:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-12-05 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 19:52 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 20:09 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs) Tupshin Harper
2002-12-06 10:38 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-12-15 5:29 ` Tracy R Reed [this message]
2002-12-07 20:34 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Kai Henningsen
2002-12-05 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-05 17:47 ` yodaiken
2002-12-05 19:08 ` John Bradford
2002-12-06 6:15 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 6:30 ` John Alvord
2002-12-06 9:48 ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-07 20:43 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-07 20:39 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-09 14:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-12-10 0:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 14:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021214212914.A8682@ultraviolet.org \
--to=treed@ultraviolet.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tupshin@tupshin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.