All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Jason Papadopoulos <jasonp@boo.net>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page coloring for 2.5.59 kernel, version 1
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:13:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030128071313.GH780@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884740000.1043737132@titus>

At some point in the past, Jason P. wrote:
>> This is yet another holding action, a port of my page coloring patch
>> to the 2.5 kernel. This is a minimal port (x86 only) intended to get
>> some testing done; once again the algorithm used is the same as in 
>> previous patches. There are several cleanups and removed 2.4-isms that
>> make the code somewhat more compact, though.
>> I'll be experimenting with other coloring schemes later this week.
>> www.boo.net/~jasonp/page_color-2.5.59-20030127.patch
>> Feedback of any sort welcome.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:58:53PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I took a 16-way NUMA-Q (700MHz P3 Xeon's w/2MB L2 cache) and ran some 
> cpu-intensive benchmarks (kernel compile on warm cache with -j32 and
> -j 256, SDET 1 - 128 users, and numaschedbench with 1 to 64 processes, 
> which is a memory thrasher to test node affinity of memory operations), 
> and compared to virgin 2.5.59 - no measurable difference on any test. 

I think this one really needs to be done with the userspace cache
thrashing microbenchmarks. I also have rather serious reservations
about the interaction of the qlists with the per-cpu lists.


-- wli

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Jason Papadopoulos <jasonp@boo.net>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page coloring for 2.5.59 kernel, version 1
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 23:13:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030128071313.GH780@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884740000.1043737132@titus>

At some point in the past, Jason P. wrote:
>> This is yet another holding action, a port of my page coloring patch
>> to the 2.5 kernel. This is a minimal port (x86 only) intended to get
>> some testing done; once again the algorithm used is the same as in 
>> previous patches. There are several cleanups and removed 2.4-isms that
>> make the code somewhat more compact, though.
>> I'll be experimenting with other coloring schemes later this week.
>> www.boo.net/~jasonp/page_color-2.5.59-20030127.patch
>> Feedback of any sort welcome.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:58:53PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> I took a 16-way NUMA-Q (700MHz P3 Xeon's w/2MB L2 cache) and ran some 
> cpu-intensive benchmarks (kernel compile on warm cache with -j32 and
> -j 256, SDET 1 - 128 users, and numaschedbench with 1 to 64 processes, 
> which is a memory thrasher to test node affinity of memory operations), 
> and compared to virgin 2.5.59 - no measurable difference on any test. 

I think this one really needs to be done with the userspace cache
thrashing microbenchmarks. I also have rather serious reservations
about the interaction of the qlists with the per-cpu lists.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-28  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-28  3:47 [PATCH] page coloring for 2.5.59 kernel, version 1 Jason Papadopoulos
2003-01-28  3:47 ` Jason Papadopoulos
2003-01-28  3:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-28  3:57   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-28  4:11   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-28  4:11     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-28  6:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28  6:58   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28  7:13   ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-01-28  7:13     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-28 16:06     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28 16:06       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28 16:41       ` Falk Hueffner
2003-01-28 16:41         ` Falk Hueffner
     [not found] <3.0.6.32.20030127224726.00806c20@boo.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <884740000.1043737132@titus.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20030128071313.GH780@holomorphy.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <1466000000.1043770007@titus.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-01-28 16:37       ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-28 16:37         ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-28 16:49         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28 16:49           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-28 17:06         ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-28 17:06           ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-28 17:22           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-28 17:49 jasonp
2003-01-28 17:49 ` jasonp
2003-01-28 18:01 jasonp
2003-01-28 18:01 ` jasonp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030128071313.GH780@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=jasonp@boo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.