Re: reiser4 and 2.5.60

[Ookhoi <ookhoi@humilis.net>]

Oleg Drokin wrote (ao):
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:31:51AM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
> > Sure. It is a P-MMX, 200MHz, with 512MB ram, and a 4GB scsi disk.
> 
> Hm. That must be real slow, is it? (just because not all of the RAM is
> covered by L2 cache, I mean. Or do you have some sensible chipset in
> there?).

It is slow, but I am not aware of issues with too little L2 cache. A
quick look at dmesg didn't give me more clue. Can you please explain a
bit, or give some google keywords?

It is only 200MHz, so I expect it to be slow, but if I can make it
faster that would be nice (without removing the ram if possible ;-)

> > As said before, I do reiser4 on a loop fs. I did the same with
> > reiser3, and that worked ok. Could the loop fs be a problem for
> > reiser4?
> 
> Well, it should not, but if you can test it not on loop device just to
> be sure, that would be nice.

I see if I can free a partition, or put an extra disk in.

> > Do you need more info, or want me to test things?
> 
> I need to experiment a bit more locallywith info I got from you, I
> think.
> 
> > It seems that reiser4 in BK is not updated for a few days now.
> 
> <joke>Because it is already perfect, nothing to improve</joke> ;)

Goody :-)  Well, let me know if you want me to test something. I'll let
you know what happens with reiser4 on a partition.