All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel@tbdnetworks.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multiple & vs. && and | vs. || bugs in 2.4.20
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:03:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030302140325.A32479@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030302184114.Q2791@almesberger.net>; from wa@almesberger.net on Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:41:14PM -0300

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:41:14PM -0300, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> While I agree with your observation in general, this is actually
> something the compiler should be able to figure out by itself:
> 
>  - there's only a side-effect if acm is NULL

In general there's also a side effect if acm is uninitialized.
I didn't look at the code in question here.

As for the rest, it's true that we should be able to do this,
but we don't currently have a pass that globally propagates
"trapiness" of memory references.  It would be a useful thing
to have though, particularly for Java, which is required to
arrange for these traps to be able to be caught with exceptions,
and other horrible reordering issues.


r~

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-02 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-02 12:14 [PATCH] Multiple & vs. && and | vs. || bugs in 2.4.20 Norbert Kiesel
2003-03-02 18:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-03-02 18:25   ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-02 21:41   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-03-02 22:03     ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2003-03-03  2:03   ` Norbert Kiesel
2003-03-03  3:02     ` John Levon
2003-03-06 19:58   ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-07 18:45     ` Norbert Kiesel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030302140325.A32479@twiddle.net \
    --to=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nkiesel@tbdnetworks.com \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.