From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: bzzz@tmi.comex.ru, adilger@clusterfs.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:49:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030315054910.GN20188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030314205455.49f834c2.akpm@digeo.com>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:54:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> `dbench 512' will presumably do lots of IO and spend significant
> time in I/O wait. You should see the effects of this change more
> if you use fewer clients (say, 32) so it doesn't hit disk.
Throughput 226.57 MB/sec 32 procs
dbench 32 2>& 1 25.04s user 515.02s system 1069% cpu 50.516 total
vma samples %-age symbol name
c0106ff4 1877599 35.8654 default_idle
c01dc3b0 586997 11.2127 __copy_to_user_ll
c0108140 193213 3.6907 .text.lock.semaphore
c015249a 137467 2.62586 .text.lock.file_table
c01dc418 117981 2.25364 __copy_from_user_ll
c01dc59c 115415 2.20463 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c016997b 106198 2.02857 .text.lock.dcache
c0119dac 98439 1.88036 scheduler_tick
c01dc510 95745 1.8289 atomic_dec_and_lock
c0119058 91746 1.75251 try_to_wake_up
c011fadc 88996 1.69998 profile_hook
c0107d0c 84514 1.61436 __down
c01522a0 70518 1.34702 file_move
c011a1bc 68364 1.30587 schedule
c011c4ff 59716 1.14068 .text.lock.sched
c0168aac 58337 1.11434 d_lookup
c015f3dc 58111 1.11002 path_lookup
c0119860 55141 1.05329 load_balance
procs -----------memory---------- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
r b free buff cache bi bo in cs us sy id wa
11 0 47538048 549664 737120 0 0 1028 12123 2 33 65 0
6 2 47534592 550880 738272 0 16312 1085 12498 2 28 67 3
15 2 47559680 552064 711936 0 2332 1111 12197 2 30 63 6
10 3 47539648 547808 737344 0 5012 1174 12683 2 28 63 8
13 4 47585600 548736 689728 0 1616 1173 12393 2 31 58 8
17 2 47575680 550432 699264 0 2252 1224 12135 2 35 54 8
31 2 47643008 550944 631712 0 2216 1189 4795 2 82 15 2
28 1 47724288 551296 548320 0 2532 1178 4297 2 77 18 4
25 2 47798464 552032 473824 0 2724 1199 3283 2 73 22 3
12 5 48026944 552096 243296 0 2272 1170 4389 2 54 37 7
0 9 48201344 552160 69696 0 3480 1167 466 0 8 62 29
1 4 48206720 552160 64512 0 3252 1173 152 0 0 83 16
1 2 48210880 552160 60864 0 3232 1163 106 0 0 90 9
2 2 48210880 552160 60864 0 3592 1163 111 0 0 93 6
1 8 48256320 552160 36928 0 3008 1146 587 0 2 79 20
2 7 48264128 552160 30016 0 3488 1153 170 0 0 76 24
2 6 48268544 552160 26912 0 3012 1151 145 0 0 79 21
2 5 48273408 552160 22400 0 312 1162 116 0 0 83 16
4 0 48277248 552160 21056 12 8 1051 184 0 1 97 1
0 0 48280448 552160 21280 0 0 1033 59 0 0 100 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-15 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 8:55 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:17 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 7:20 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-14 20:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 21:14 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 4:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 5:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 5:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:49 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-15 6:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 7:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 9:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 11:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 12:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 12:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:16 ` [Ext2-devel] " Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 8:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:32 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 9:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-14 18:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-14 19:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 17:39 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 18:43 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-13 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-13 19:44 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030315054910.GN20188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.