From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:29:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030315082927.GR20188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r899yrhx.fsf@lexa.home.net>
Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Nope. What we're trying to measure here is pure in-memory lock
AM> contention, locked bus traffic, context switches, etc, etc. To
AM> do that we need to get the IO system out of the picture.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:16:10AM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> I simple use own pretty simple test. btw, you may disable preallocation
> to increase allocation rate
This looks very interesting, but it may have to wait ca. 24 hours for
some benchmark time b/c of the long boot times and late hour in .us.
This also looks like it would be a much better stress test, and the
NUMA-Q is known for bringing out many rare races. There is are good
reasons to run this test even aside from performance.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-15 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 8:55 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:17 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 7:20 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-14 20:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 21:14 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 4:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 5:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 5:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 7:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 9:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 11:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 12:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 12:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:16 ` [Ext2-devel] " Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 8:29 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-15 8:32 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 9:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-14 18:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-14 19:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 17:39 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 18:43 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-13 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-13 19:44 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030315082927.GR20188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.