All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rwhron@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 -- updated results
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 01:03:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030324090321.GJ1350@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5mg86$qm$1@penguin.transmeta.com>

Chris Friesen  <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
>> The ones that stand out are:
>> --fork/exec (due to rmap I assume?)
>> --mmap (also due to rmap?)

On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:39:34AM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes. You could try the objrmap patches, they are supposed to help. They
> may be in -mm, I'm not sure.

I recently asked Randy Hron which 2.5.x patches made the biggest
difference in the tests he's done. He pasted the following:

<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies>                                  null     null       
+               open    signal   signal    fork    execve  /bin/sh
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> kernel                           call      I/O    
+stat    fstat    close   install   handle  process  process  process
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.65                            0.66  0.96298     3
+.60     1.48     5.31     1.92     3.89     1279     3233    13703
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.65-mm1                        0.63  1.04114     3
+.65     1.57     6.39     2.29     3.92     1370     3621    13985
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.65-mm2                        0.65  0.98654     3
+.64     1.46     6.88     1.91     3.94     1511     3676    13502
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap              0.66  0.96061     3
+.82     1.45     5.38     1.90     4.68     1414     3497    13169
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.2.23                            0.42  0.80455     4
+.76     1.24     5.77     1.43     2.74      788     2303    30829
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.4.21-pre4aa3                    0.62  0.72201     3
+.44     1.02     5.32     1.41     3.43      848     2114    10117
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.4.21-pre5                       0.62  0.75284     3
+.18     1.02     5.35     1.41     3.25      927     2559    11884
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.4.21-pre5-akpm                  0.61  0.73119     3
+.32     1.02     5.28     1.41     3.16      865     2421    11636
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.63-mjb1                       0.66  1.12795     4
+.01     1.64     6.66     1.92     4.49     1125     2793    12475
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.62-mjb2                       0.64  1.09703     4
+.12     1.66     5.77     1.89     4.05     1128     2888    12669
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.63-mjb2                       0.67  1.03824     4
+.12     1.66     5.87     1.90     4.39     1144     2985    12650
<hrandoz:#kernelnewbies> 2.5.62-mm3                        0.62  0.95155     4
+.72     1.42     7.55     1.90     3.92     1164     3073    13101


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-24  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-22 16:11 lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 Chris Friesen
2003-03-22 16:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-22 16:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-22 17:29 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23  5:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-24  6:08 ` lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 -- updated results Chris Friesen
2003-03-24  8:39   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-24  9:03     ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-24 19:53 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2003-03-24 20:01 ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 21:09   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 22:04       ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 22:04         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 22:23           ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 22:19         ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-25 18:23         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-26  1:50           ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-26  2:09             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 20:11 Nakajima, Jun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030324090321.GJ1350@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.