All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 -- updated results
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:04:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <546310000.1048543470@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030324220435.GA11421@work.bitmover.com>

>> > I presume it does 100 iterations of a test (like fork latency?). Or does 
>> > it just do one? Can I make it do 1,000,000 iterations or something
>> > fairly easily ? ;-) I didn't really look closely, just apt-get install
>> > lmbench ... 
>> 
>> Yes, that is something I've wanted several times.  Just a way to say "run
>> this test for ever so I can profile the thing".
>> 
>> Even a sleazy environment string would suffice.
> 
> It's been there, I suppose you need to read the source to figure it out
> though the lmbench script also plays with this I believe.

Yay! Thank you.
 
> work ~/LMbench2/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu ENOUGH=1000000 time bw_pipe
> Pipe bandwidth: 655.37 MB/sec
> real    0m23.411s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m1.180s
> 
> work ~/LMbench2/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu time bw_pipe
> Pipe bandwidth: 809.81 MB/sec
> 
> real    0m2.821s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m1.180s

Mmmm. Any idea why the results are so dramtically different? 655 vs 809?
Looks odd ;-)

m.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-24 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-24 19:53 lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 -- updated results Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2003-03-24 20:01 ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 21:09   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-24 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-24 22:04       ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 22:04         ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-03-24 22:23           ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-24 22:19         ` Chris Friesen
2003-03-25 18:23         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-26  1:50           ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-26  2:09             ` Martin J. Bligh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-24 20:11 Nakajima, Jun
2003-03-22 16:11 lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 Chris Friesen
2003-03-24  6:08 ` lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 -- updated results Chris Friesen
2003-03-24  8:39   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-24  9:03     ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=546310000.1048543470@flay \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.