From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: bcrl@redhat.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filesystem aio rdwr patchset
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:03:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030401220313.C1857@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030401215957.A1800@in.ibm.com>; from suparna@in.ibm.com on Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> 03aiobread.patch : code for async breads which can
> be used by filesystems for providing async get block
> implementation
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Labs, India
diff -ur linux-2.5.66/fs/buffer.c linux-2.5.66aio/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.5.66/fs/buffer.c Tue Mar 25 03:30:48 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66aio/fs/buffer.c Wed Mar 26 19:11:09 2003
@@ -118,21 +118,38 @@
* from becoming locked again - you have to lock it yourself
* if you want to preserve its state.
*/
-void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+int __wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head * bh)
{
wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bh_waitq_head(bh);
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_WAIT(sync_wait);
+ wait_queue_t *wait = &sync_wait;
+ int state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+
+ if (current->iocb) {
+ wait = ¤t->iocb->ki_wait;
+ state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ }
get_bh(bh);
do {
- prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ prepare_to_wait(wqh, wait, state);
if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
blk_run_queues();
+ if (current->iocb) {
+ put_bh(bh); /* TBD: is this correct ? */
+ return -EIOCBQUEUED;
+ }
io_schedule();
}
} while (buffer_locked(bh));
put_bh(bh);
- finish_wait(wqh, &wait);
+ finish_wait(wqh, wait);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+{
+ do_sync_op(__wait_on_buffer_async(bh));
}
static void
@@ -1188,9 +1205,11 @@
__brelse(bh);
}
-static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- lock_buffer(bh);
+ if (-EIOCBQUEUED == lock_buffer_async(bh))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBQUEUED);
+
if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
unlock_buffer(bh);
return bh;
@@ -1200,7 +1219,8 @@
get_bh(bh);
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_io_sync;
submit_bh(READ, bh);
- wait_on_buffer(bh);
+ if (-EIOCBQUEUED == wait_on_buffer_async(bh))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBQUEUED);
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh;
}
@@ -1208,6 +1228,14 @@
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *ret_bh;
+
+ do_sync_op(ret_bh = __bread_slow_async(bh));
+ return ret_bh;
+}
+
/*
* Per-cpu buffer LRU implementation. To reduce the cost of __find_get_block().
* The bhs[] array is sorted - newest buffer is at bhs[0]. Buffers have their
@@ -1382,6 +1410,17 @@
bh = __bread_slow(bh);
return bh;
}
+
+
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_async(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size);
+
+ if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ bh = __bread_slow_async(bh);
+ return bh;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
/*
diff -ur linux-2.5.66/include/linux/buffer_head.h linux-2.5.66aio/include/linux/buffer_head.h
--- linux-2.5.66/include/linux/buffer_head.h Tue Mar 25 03:29:54 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66aio/include/linux/buffer_head.h Wed Mar 26 19:26:42 2003
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@
void __invalidate_buffers(kdev_t dev, int);
int sync_blockdev(struct block_device *bdev);
void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *);
+int __wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *);
wait_queue_head_t *bh_waitq_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
void wake_up_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh);
int fsync_bdev(struct block_device *);
@@ -166,6 +167,8 @@
void __brelse(struct buffer_head *);
void __bforget(struct buffer_head *);
struct buffer_head *__bread(struct block_device *, sector_t block, int size);
+struct buffer_head *__bread_async(struct block_device *, sector_t block,
+ int size);
struct buffer_head *alloc_buffer_head(void);
void free_buffer_head(struct buffer_head * bh);
void FASTCALL(unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh));
@@ -237,6 +240,12 @@
return __bread(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
}
+static inline struct buffer_head *sb_bread_async(struct super_block *sb,
+ sector_t block)
+{
+ return __bread_async(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
+}
+
static inline struct buffer_head *sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
{
return __getblk(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
@@ -262,12 +271,28 @@
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
}
+static inline int wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ if (buffer_locked(bh))
+ return __wait_on_buffer_async(bh);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
while (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
}
+static inline int lock_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ if (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
+ return __wait_on_buffer_async(bh);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Debug
*/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
To: bcrl@redhat.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filesystem aio rdwr patchset
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 22:03:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030401220313.C1857@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030401215957.A1800@in.ibm.com>; from suparna@in.ibm.com on Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:59:57PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
> 03aiobread.patch : code for async breads which can
> be used by filesystems for providing async get block
> implementation
--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Labs, India
diff -ur linux-2.5.66/fs/buffer.c linux-2.5.66aio/fs/buffer.c
--- linux-2.5.66/fs/buffer.c Tue Mar 25 03:30:48 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66aio/fs/buffer.c Wed Mar 26 19:11:09 2003
@@ -118,21 +118,38 @@
* from becoming locked again - you have to lock it yourself
* if you want to preserve its state.
*/
-void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+int __wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head * bh)
{
wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bh_waitq_head(bh);
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_WAIT(sync_wait);
+ wait_queue_t *wait = &sync_wait;
+ int state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+
+ if (current->iocb) {
+ wait = ¤t->iocb->ki_wait;
+ state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ }
get_bh(bh);
do {
- prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ prepare_to_wait(wqh, wait, state);
if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
blk_run_queues();
+ if (current->iocb) {
+ put_bh(bh); /* TBD: is this correct ? */
+ return -EIOCBQUEUED;
+ }
io_schedule();
}
} while (buffer_locked(bh));
put_bh(bh);
- finish_wait(wqh, &wait);
+ finish_wait(wqh, wait);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head * bh)
+{
+ do_sync_op(__wait_on_buffer_async(bh));
}
static void
@@ -1188,9 +1205,11 @@
__brelse(bh);
}
-static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+static struct buffer_head *__bread_slow_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- lock_buffer(bh);
+ if (-EIOCBQUEUED == lock_buffer_async(bh))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBQUEUED);
+
if (buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
unlock_buffer(bh);
return bh;
@@ -1200,7 +1219,8 @@
get_bh(bh);
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_io_sync;
submit_bh(READ, bh);
- wait_on_buffer(bh);
+ if (-EIOCBQUEUED == wait_on_buffer_async(bh))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EIOCBQUEUED);
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh;
}
@@ -1208,6 +1228,14 @@
return NULL;
}
+static inline struct buffer_head *__bread_slow(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *ret_bh;
+
+ do_sync_op(ret_bh = __bread_slow_async(bh));
+ return ret_bh;
+}
+
/*
* Per-cpu buffer LRU implementation. To reduce the cost of __find_get_block().
* The bhs[] array is sorted - newest buffer is at bhs[0]. Buffers have their
@@ -1382,6 +1410,17 @@
bh = __bread_slow(bh);
return bh;
}
+
+
+struct buffer_head *
+__bread_async(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
+{
+ struct buffer_head *bh = __getblk(bdev, block, size);
+
+ if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ bh = __bread_slow_async(bh);
+ return bh;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
/*
diff -ur linux-2.5.66/include/linux/buffer_head.h linux-2.5.66aio/include/linux/buffer_head.h
--- linux-2.5.66/include/linux/buffer_head.h Tue Mar 25 03:29:54 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66aio/include/linux/buffer_head.h Wed Mar 26 19:26:42 2003
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@
void __invalidate_buffers(kdev_t dev, int);
int sync_blockdev(struct block_device *bdev);
void __wait_on_buffer(struct buffer_head *);
+int __wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *);
wait_queue_head_t *bh_waitq_head(struct buffer_head *bh);
void wake_up_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh);
int fsync_bdev(struct block_device *);
@@ -166,6 +167,8 @@
void __brelse(struct buffer_head *);
void __bforget(struct buffer_head *);
struct buffer_head *__bread(struct block_device *, sector_t block, int size);
+struct buffer_head *__bread_async(struct block_device *, sector_t block,
+ int size);
struct buffer_head *alloc_buffer_head(void);
void free_buffer_head(struct buffer_head * bh);
void FASTCALL(unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh));
@@ -237,6 +240,12 @@
return __bread(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
}
+static inline struct buffer_head *sb_bread_async(struct super_block *sb,
+ sector_t block)
+{
+ return __bread_async(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
+}
+
static inline struct buffer_head *sb_getblk(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
{
return __getblk(sb->s_bdev, block, sb->s_blocksize);
@@ -262,12 +271,28 @@
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
}
+static inline int wait_on_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ if (buffer_locked(bh))
+ return __wait_on_buffer_async(bh);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void lock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
while (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
}
+static inline int lock_buffer_async(struct buffer_head *bh)
+{
+ if (test_set_buffer_locked(bh))
+ return __wait_on_buffer_async(bh);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Debug
*/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-01 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-01 16:29 [PATCH] Filesystem aio rdwr patchset Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-01 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-02 2:38 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-02 2:38 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:33 ` Suparna Bhattacharya [this message]
2003-04-01 16:33 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:33 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 16:33 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-01 20:27 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-01 20:27 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2003-04-02 10:19 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-02 10:19 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-03 15:42 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-07 8:41 ` Sample aio wait patch using tsk->io_wait Suparna Bhattacharya
2003-04-07 8:41 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030401220313.C1857@in.ibm.com \
--to=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.