From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm3
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:12:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030509181257.GB8931@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030508013958.157b27b7.akpm@digeo.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:39:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.69-mm3.gz
> Will appear sometime at
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.69/2.5.69-mm3/
topology.h has a syntactic hygiene issue where it has a for () loop with
an if () in the body defined as a macro:
#define foo(...) for (...) if (...)
This patch prepares some of the bitop definitions used for the loop
mechanics to be usable in headers where BITS_PER_LONG is not guaranteed
to be defined for some reason. It removes the #ifdef on BITS_PER_LONG
in favor of if (sizeof(...) == ...) tests so hweight_long() will be
defined even when BITS_PER_LONG is not. unsigned long is also used for
some variables and/or return types that changed size with BITS_PER_LONG.
The 32-bit generic_hweight64() also changed its argument from a pointer
to a u64, which actually makes for a consistent interface in both cases.
The follow-up will make use of this to clean up the hygiene issue above
and correct a compilation error in topology.h
-- wli
diff -urpN mm3-2.5.69-1/include/linux/bitops.h mm3-2.5.69-2/include/linux/bitops.h
--- mm3-2.5.69-1/include/linux/bitops.h 2003-05-09 09:22:16.000000000 -0700
+++ mm3-2.5.69-2/include/linux/bitops.h 2003-05-09 10:27:57.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_BITOPS_H
#define _LINUX_BITOPS_H
+#include <asm/types.h>
#include <asm/bitops.h>
/*
@@ -107,11 +108,14 @@ static inline unsigned int generic_hweig
return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F);
}
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
-
-static inline u64 generic_hweight64(u64 w)
+static inline unsigned long generic_hweight64(u64 w)
{
- u64 res = (w & 0x5555555555555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555);
+ u64 res;
+ if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 4)
+ return generic_hweight32((unsigned long)(w >> 32)) +
+ generic_hweight32((unsigned long)w);
+
+ res = (w & 0x5555555555555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555);
res = (res & 0x3333333333333333) + ((res >> 2) & 0x3333333333333333);
res = (res & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F);
res = (res & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF) + ((res >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF);
@@ -119,22 +123,9 @@ static inline u64 generic_hweight64(u64
return (res & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF) + ((res >> 32) & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF);
}
-#define hweight_long(w) generic_hweight64(w)
-
-#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
-
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
-
-static inline unsigned int generic_hweight64(unsigned int *w)
+static inline unsigned long hweight_long(unsigned long x)
{
- return generic_hweight32(w[0]) + generic_hweight32(w[1]);
+ return sizeof(x) == 4 ? generic_hweight32(x) : generic_hweight64(x);
}
-#define hweight_long(w) generic_hweight32(w)
-
-#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 32 */
-
-#include <asm/bitops.h>
-
-
#endif
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm3
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:12:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030509181257.GB8931@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030508013958.157b27b7.akpm@digeo.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:39:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.69-mm3.gz
> Will appear sometime at
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.69/2.5.69-mm3/
topology.h has a syntactic hygiene issue where it has a for () loop with
an if () in the body defined as a macro:
#define foo(...) for (...) if (...)
This patch prepares some of the bitop definitions used for the loop
mechanics to be usable in headers where BITS_PER_LONG is not guaranteed
to be defined for some reason. It removes the #ifdef on BITS_PER_LONG
in favor of if (sizeof(...) == ...) tests so hweight_long() will be
defined even when BITS_PER_LONG is not. unsigned long is also used for
some variables and/or return types that changed size with BITS_PER_LONG.
The 32-bit generic_hweight64() also changed its argument from a pointer
to a u64, which actually makes for a consistent interface in both cases.
The follow-up will make use of this to clean up the hygiene issue above
and correct a compilation error in topology.h
-- wli
diff -urpN mm3-2.5.69-1/include/linux/bitops.h mm3-2.5.69-2/include/linux/bitops.h
--- mm3-2.5.69-1/include/linux/bitops.h 2003-05-09 09:22:16.000000000 -0700
+++ mm3-2.5.69-2/include/linux/bitops.h 2003-05-09 10:27:57.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_BITOPS_H
#define _LINUX_BITOPS_H
+#include <asm/types.h>
#include <asm/bitops.h>
/*
@@ -107,11 +108,14 @@ static inline unsigned int generic_hweig
return (res & 0x0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F);
}
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 64)
-
-static inline u64 generic_hweight64(u64 w)
+static inline unsigned long generic_hweight64(u64 w)
{
- u64 res = (w & 0x5555555555555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555);
+ u64 res;
+ if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 4)
+ return generic_hweight32((unsigned long)(w >> 32)) +
+ generic_hweight32((unsigned long)w);
+
+ res = (w & 0x5555555555555555) + ((w >> 1) & 0x5555555555555555);
res = (res & 0x3333333333333333) + ((res >> 2) & 0x3333333333333333);
res = (res & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F) + ((res >> 4) & 0x0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F);
res = (res & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF) + ((res >> 8) & 0x00FF00FF00FF00FF);
@@ -119,22 +123,9 @@ static inline u64 generic_hweight64(u64
return (res & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF) + ((res >> 32) & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF);
}
-#define hweight_long(w) generic_hweight64(w)
-
-#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
-
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG == 32)
-
-static inline unsigned int generic_hweight64(unsigned int *w)
+static inline unsigned long hweight_long(unsigned long x)
{
- return generic_hweight32(w[0]) + generic_hweight32(w[1]);
+ return sizeof(x) == 4 ? generic_hweight32(x) : generic_hweight64(x);
}
-#define hweight_long(w) generic_hweight32(w)
-
-#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 32 */
-
-#include <asm/bitops.h>
-
-
#endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-09 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-08 8:39 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-08 8:39 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-09 14:10 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-09 14:10 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2003-05-09 19:49 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-09 19:49 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-09 21:18 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-09 21:18 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 20:13 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Bill Davidsen
2003-05-13 20:13 ` 2.5.69-mm3 Bill Davidsen
2003-05-09 14:53 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 14:53 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 15:37 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 15:37 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 17:55 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 17:55 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:12 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-05-09 18:12 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:15 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:15 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:54 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-09 18:54 ` 2.5.69-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-13 18:21 ` 2.5.69-mm3 bug Szonyi Calin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030509181257.GB8931@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.