From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:57:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030514215704.GA4232@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030514.140257.26294164.davem@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:02:57PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:59:49 -0700
>
> Any reason to not just use a struct device here? This is a device,
> right? Or at the very least, a kobject would be acceptable.
>
> As I understand it, it's a device private for a struct netdevice.
Ah, thanks.
> It is referenced much differently, I don't think using kobject
> is as appropriate as one might expect.
kobjects are always appropriate! :)
Remember, you don't have to use the sysfs part of a kobject to get the
reference counting and callback when the last reference is dropped
goodness. A few places in the kernel use them in this manner only,
that's what it was created for.
Ok, if they aren't needed here, I have no problem, just wanted to make
sure.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-14 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 20:20 [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev chas williams
2003-05-14 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 22:16 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 4:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 14:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 20:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 20:20 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 0:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 16:05 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 20:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 20:59 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 21:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-05-14 22:21 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 5:20 ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 14:32 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 19:09 ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 19:17 ` chas williams
2003-05-20 12:25 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 0:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 14:40 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 15:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 18:48 ` Francois Romieu
2003-05-22 17:59 ` Linux 2.4 scheduler is RTOS-alike? Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:01 ` Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:37 ` Elladan
2003-05-22 20:47 ` Elladan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030514215704.GA4232@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.