From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Cc: duncan.sands@wanadoo.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:09:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030515190922.GA10161@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305151432.h4FEW5Gi012599@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:32:05AM -0400, chas williams wrote:
> In message <20030515052041.GA5995@kroah.com>,Greg KH writes:
> >It's not really bothering me, just wondering when it will go away (I see
> >it when building one of the USB ATM drivers...)
>
> the MOD_* functions in the speedtch driver don't need to be there.
> since 2.3.something (if i remember correctly) the reference counting
> has been handled by the upper layer (ala fops_get/fops_put). the
> following patch removes these extra bits:
Thanks, didn't know they could be removed. The speedtch author told me
a while ago that the fops didn't protect it...
I'll go apply this patch.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 20:20 [PATCH][ATM] add reference counting to atm_dev chas williams
2003-05-14 20:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 22:16 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 4:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 14:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 20:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-15 20:20 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 0:14 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 16:05 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 20:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 20:59 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-14 21:57 ` Greg KH
2003-05-14 22:21 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 5:20 ` Greg KH
2003-05-15 14:32 ` chas williams
2003-05-15 19:09 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-05-15 19:17 ` chas williams
2003-05-20 12:25 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 0:12 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-16 14:40 ` Duncan Sands
2003-05-16 15:39 ` chas williams
2003-05-16 18:48 ` Francois Romieu
2003-05-22 17:59 ` Linux 2.4 scheduler is RTOS-alike? Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:01 ` Ming Lei
2003-05-22 20:37 ` Elladan
2003-05-22 20:47 ` Elladan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030515190922.GA10161@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=duncan.sands@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.