From: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.org.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols)
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 17:33:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030607073321.GC1540@cancer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306040838370.13753-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:41:59AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Any opinions on moving it out of lib/lib.a?
>
> That makes sense. lib/lib.a wasn't ever _that_ sensible, since we only
> really include object files in it that we know should be linked in. The
> linker really does know less than the build system, and in this case that
> seems to be causing a real bug.
This patch needs a couple of extra things before it drops it's evil status, and I'm not sure how to do them exactly.
Instead of going the lib/lib.a route (which I presume was used so that the linker could decide weather to go with arch specific functions or the generic lib/ ones) it leaves it up to the arch to sort it all out. This could be fair enough, as most (14/20) archs seem to implement their own dump_stack anyway. However, bust_spinlocks could be a problem as only i386, mips64, x86_64 and s390 specfically implement it.
Is it a good idea to make the archs themselves include the generic implementation if they don't do it themselves? Or is there a way to detect this in the build system (this would be more elegant, but I have no idea how to do it).
Evil patch that will probably break 16 archs from compiling follows:
diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/Makefile 2003-06-06 23:55:42.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/Makefile 2003-06-07 01:09:05.000000000 +1000
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
core-y := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(core-y))
drivers-y := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(drivers-y))
net-y := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(net-y))
-libs-y := $(patsubst %/, %/lib.a, $(libs-y))
+libs-y := $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(libs-y))
ifdef include_config
diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/arch/i386/lib/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/arch/i386/lib/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/arch/i386/lib/Makefile 2003-05-05 09:53:01.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/arch/i386/lib/Makefile 2003-06-07 17:22:39.000000000 +1000
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
# Makefile for i386-specific library files..
#
-L_TARGET = lib.a
-
obj-y = checksum.o delay.o \
usercopy.o getuser.o \
memcpy.o strstr.o
diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/lib/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/lib/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/lib/Makefile 2003-06-02 23:28:32.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/lib/Makefile 2003-06-07 17:21:44.000000000 +1000
@@ -6,10 +6,8 @@
# unless it's something special (ie not a .c file).
#
-L_TARGET := lib.a
-
obj-y := errno.o ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
- bust_spinlocks.o rbtree.o radix-tree.o dump_stack.o \
+ rbtree.o radix-tree.o \
kobject.o idr.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-07 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-03 1:13 CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols Stewart Smith
2003-06-03 13:16 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-04 5:56 ` [PATCH] fixed: " Stewart Smith
2003-06-04 15:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-04 15:30 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-04 15:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-04 15:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07 7:33 ` Stewart Smith [this message]
2003-06-07 7:39 ` [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols) Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-07 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07 19:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030607073321.GC1540@cancer \
--to=stewart@linux.org.au \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.