From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: bad: scheduling while atomic!
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 14:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030615142950.A32102@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
I'm seeing tonnes of this with UP preempt in 2.5.71. The following is
just one case which I've been able to track down:
bad: scheduling while atomic! (00000250 0 8 mtdblockd)
[<c02372d0>] (schedule+0x0/0x490) from [<c0335fd0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x220/0x258)
r7 = 00000000 r6 = C0109FBC r5 = C0108000 r4 = C0109FB8
[<c0335db0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x0/0x258) from [<c0224554>] (kernel_thread+0x40/0x48)
bad: scheduling while atomic! (00000251 0 8 mtdblockd)
[<c02372d0>] (schedule+0x0/0x490) from [<c0335fd0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x220/0x258)
r7 = 00000000 r6 = C0109FBC r5 = C0108000 r4 = C0109FB8
[<c0335db0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x0/0x258) from [<c0224554>] (kernel_thread+0x40/0x48)
bad: scheduling while atomic! (00000252 0 8 mtdblockd)
[<c02372d0>] (schedule+0x0/0x490) from [<c0335fd0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x220/0x258)
r7 = 00000000 r6 = C0109FBC r5 = C0108000 r4 = C0109FB8
[<c0335db0>] (mtd_blktrans_thread+0x0/0x258) from [<c0224554>] (kernel_thread+0x40/0x48)
(The extra numbers are: preempt_count, kernel_locked, pid and comm).
This instance seems to be caused by the following code in
drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:
while (!tr->blkcore_priv->exiting) {
spin_lock_irq(rq->queue_lock);
...
spin_unlock_irq(rq->queue_lock);
...
spin_lock_irq(rq->queue_lock);
...
}
It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
spin_unlocks. 8)
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-15 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 13:29 Russell King [this message]
2003-06-15 14:23 ` bad: scheduling while atomic! Jörn Engel
2003-06-15 17:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-15 17:17 ` Russell King
2003-06-15 19:33 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-21 5:17 Lucas Gadani
2004-03-31 8:54 Bad: " Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200403311054.55536.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-31 9:07 ` Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200403311107.02570.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-31 13:59 ` Tomasz Ciolek
[not found] ` <20040331135925.GF28355-+XVqjN4+fIJfbCVcMT5z6Ydd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-01 6:46 ` Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200404010846.02216.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-01 15:07 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-04-01 8:17 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030615142950.A32102@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.