From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:17:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030615181703.H5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055697278.1244.19.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote:
> > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
> > spin_unlocks. 8)
>
> I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful
> of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I
> assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?
Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
to do another sync up, feel free to include that.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-15 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 13:29 bad: scheduling while atomic! Russell King
2003-06-15 14:23 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-15 17:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-15 17:17 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-06-15 19:33 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-21 5:17 Lucas Gadani
2004-03-31 8:54 Bad: " Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200403311054.55536.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-31 9:07 ` Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200403311107.02570.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-03-31 13:59 ` Tomasz Ciolek
[not found] ` <20040331135925.GF28355-+XVqjN4+fIJfbCVcMT5z6Ydd74u8MsAO@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-01 6:46 ` Lukas Schrangl
[not found] ` <200404010846.02216.schrangl-hi6Y0CQ0nG0@public.gmane.org>
2004-04-01 15:07 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-04-01 8:17 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030615181703.H5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.