* assembler reference @ 2003-06-16 23:46 gml 2003-06-17 16:11 ` Mike Castle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: gml @ 2003-06-16 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-assembly can anyone recommend a decent assembler reference that covers intel and at&t styles? preferably something that comes in hardcover ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: assembler reference 2003-06-16 23:46 assembler reference gml @ 2003-06-17 16:11 ` Mike Castle 2003-06-17 17:51 ` Mike Castle 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mike Castle @ 2003-06-17 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gml; +Cc: linux-assembly On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:46:14PM -0400, gml wrote: > can anyone recommend a decent assembler reference that covers intel and at&t > styles? preferably something that comes in hardcover ;-) I once saw a paper that described how to convert between the two. It was an internal engineering doc that had been released to the public, and it was for a very well known and respected firm (at the time anyway). Unfortunately I can't remember who it was from! I am pretty sure I saw it come across the DJGCC lists years ago (i.e., when in the era when it was still called DJGCC rather than DJGPP, which puts it at the very begining of the project). Anyway, at the time, I thought it was a very good document. I just wish I could find it again. That aside, I found out some interesting info on DJ's site at delorie.com. For example: Beginning with Binutils 2.10, Gas has an option that causes it to accept the Intel syntax, so you can use Gas to assembly Intel-style code. And linuxassembly.org looks useful. Unless you buy a bound version of the docs for GAS, though, I don't think you're going to find anything useful in print. It's all online. mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: assembler reference 2003-06-17 16:11 ` Mike Castle @ 2003-06-17 17:51 ` Mike Castle 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mike Castle @ 2003-06-17 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Castle, gml, linux-assembly On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:29AM -0700, Mike Castle wrote: > I once saw a paper that described how to convert between the two. It was > an internal engineering doc that had been released to the public, and it > was for a very well known and respected firm (at the time anyway). > Unfortunately I can't remember who it was from! Ok. Maybe it wasn't a comparison. I *think* this *might* be the document I was thinking about. I do seem to think that it was ISC. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=218%40dumbcat.sf.ca.us&output=gplain Section 3.1 is section of interest. mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-17 17:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-06-16 23:46 assembler reference gml 2003-06-17 16:11 ` Mike Castle 2003-06-17 17:51 ` Mike Castle
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.