* [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 @ 2003-06-13 20:27 Petro 2003-06-13 22:38 ` Herbert Poetzl 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Petro @ 2003-06-13 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile? I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff. -- "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 2003-06-13 20:27 [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 Petro @ 2003-06-13 22:38 ` Herbert Poetzl 2003-06-16 18:45 ` Petro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-06-13 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Petro wrote: > > When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches > generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile? > > I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to > be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff. you could try this patch ... http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2 which actually works for me ... hth, Herbert > -- > "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, > Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right > answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion > of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 2003-06-13 22:38 ` Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-06-16 18:45 ` Petro 2003-06-16 21:13 ` Herbert Poetzl 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Petro @ 2003-06-16 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Petro wrote: > > When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches > > generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile? > > I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to > > be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff. > you could try this patch ... > http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2 > which actually works for me ... The make file halts with a You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1 Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series. The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from kernel.org kernel. The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out failure) against a clean linus kernel. -- "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 2003-06-16 18:45 ` Petro @ 2003-06-16 21:13 ` Herbert Poetzl 2003-06-16 21:25 ` Petro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-06-16 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-lvm; +Cc: Petro On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:43:58PM -0700, Petro wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Petro wrote: > > > When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches > > > generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile? > > > I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to > > > be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff. > > you could try this patch ... > > http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2 > > which actually works for me ... > > The make file halts with a > You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README > make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1 let me get this straight, you download a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, unpack it, apply the patch mentioned above, configure it accordingly and start a kernel compile, which then breaks with the message given above? I do not believe this, I tried it myself, and it compiled flawlessly ... I guess I am misreading your email? > Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory > doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series. which readme? > The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from > kernel.org kernel. raw = vanilla here? > The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out > failure) against a clean linus kernel. the VFS-lock patch or the lvm patch? > -- > "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, > Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right > answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion > of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 2003-06-16 21:13 ` Herbert Poetzl @ 2003-06-16 21:25 ` Petro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Petro @ 2003-06-16 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Herbert Poetzl; +Cc: linux-lvm On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:13:07AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:43:58PM -0700, Petro wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Petro wrote: > > > > When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches > > > > generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile? > > > > I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to > > > > be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff. > > > you could try this patch ... > > > http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2 > > > which actually works for me ... > > The make file halts with a > > You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README > > make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1 > let me get this straight, > you download a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, unpack it, apply > the patch mentioned above, configure it accordingly and > start a kernel compile, which then breaks with the message > given above? No, sorry--the formatting of the message was really, really bad. I downloaded the 1.0.7 stuff from Sistina, I downloaded the raw kernel, then tried to generate the patch myself. It didn't work, however: > I do not believe this, I tried it myself, and it compiled > flawlessly ... > I guess I am misreading your email? > > Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory > > doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series. > which readme? README, the only README in the patches directory. > > The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from > > kernel.org kernel. > raw = vanilla here? Yes. > > The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out > > failure) against a clean linus kernel. > the VFS-lock patch or the lvm patch? Your patch. -- "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-16 21:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-06-13 20:27 [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7 Petro 2003-06-13 22:38 ` Herbert Poetzl 2003-06-16 18:45 ` Petro 2003-06-16 21:13 ` Herbert Poetzl 2003-06-16 21:25 ` Petro
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.