* [linux-lvm] Multiple Path possible with LVM ?
@ 2003-07-08 15:44 "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch"
2003-07-08 16:13 ` Scott Mcdermott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch" @ 2003-07-08 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Hi,
is it possible to use to different alternated physical
pathes with the linux LVM ?
I want to setup a linux server an connect it to a clarrion,
but do not like to pay for the powerpath software from emc.
Under HPUX the lvm handles alternated pathes.
What about linux lvm?
Is there another way to do it ?
_
| | - switch1 -- EMC with 2 SP's
| | - switch2 --/
|_|
Linuxbox with 2 HBA's
Thanks and bye Peer
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie
Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch
Carl-Zeiss-Promenade 10 Telefon: ++49 3641 6437-52
D-07745 Jena Telefax: ++49 3641 6437-10
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [linux-lvm] Multiple Path possible with LVM ?
2003-07-08 15:44 [linux-lvm] Multiple Path possible with LVM ? "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch"
@ 2003-07-08 16:13 ` Scott Mcdermott
2003-07-08 19:01 ` Lars Grobe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott Mcdermott @ 2003-07-08 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch on Tue 8/07 22:43 +0200:
> is it possible to use to different alternated physical
> pathes with the linux LVM ?
Just put your lvm volume on an md multipath device. Note
that these are not loadbalanced paths in stock kernels, just
failover paths.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Multiple Path possible with LVM ?
2003-07-08 16:13 ` Scott Mcdermott
@ 2003-07-08 19:01 ` Lars Grobe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Grobe @ 2003-07-08 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Hi!
> Just put your lvm volume on an md multipath device. Note
> that these are not loadbalanced paths in stock kernels, just
> failover paths.
Well, in evms 2.1, with 2.4.21 and the md-multipath, I am offered
a load-balanced multipath configuration. However, as I currently
have the expensive emc module mentioned in the firt mail ;-), I
didn't really try this.
If you want to have load balancing, just divide each raidset into
two luns / "devices", and access each raidset via two paths by this
configuration. If you put an lvm-stripeset over those two luns,
you get a "load-balanced" access to your raidset over both channels.
I am currently doing tests with these configurations, but I have moved
to evms with our new fileserver because of some cluster functionality
in the 2.x-releases of evms. We have shared storage between two nodes,
and while you can do this with lvm, it is AFAIK a bit dangerous because
you must make sure that one nodes commits an vgscan if the other one
changed the lvm configuration.
Good luck, CU Lars.
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
Jetzt ein- oder umsteigen und USB-Speicheruhr als Pr�mie sichern!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-08 19:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-08 15:44 [linux-lvm] Multiple Path possible with LVM ? "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch"
2003-07-08 16:13 ` Scott Mcdermott
2003-07-08 19:01 ` Lars Grobe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.