Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches

[Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>]

Hi Con,

On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 12:38:37PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
 
> No, this is what I have been trying to figure out; why is it that if we put 
> all the settings the same as 2.4 that it doesn't perform as nicely. 2.5/6 
> with the old settings is certainly better than with the vanilla settings, but 
> not as good as 2.4 O(1). It does not appear to be scheduler alone, but the 
> architectural changes to 2.5 that have changed interactivity are here to 
> stay, and improving the interactivity estimator in the scheduler does help it 
> anyway. 

just a thought : have you tried to set the timer to 100Hz instead of 1kHz to
compare with 2.4 ? It might make a difference too.

Cheers,
Willy