From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, akpm@osdl.org, andrea@suse.de,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:33:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030811113302.6f30a256.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16182.54248.868067.968522@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:23:20 +1000
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> On Sunday August 10, skraw@ithnet.com wrote:
> >
> > From looking at the tests so far I would say the setup is remarkably slower
> > in terms of writing to ext3 via nfs and sync option set. I think especially
> > the"sync" is very visible - unlike reiserfs.
>
> data=journal
> makes nfsd go noticable faster over ext3. Having an external journal
> is even better.
Uh, forgive my ignorance. "journal" means metadata+data journaling. If I have
large data movement, how can that be even faster? Ok, I see the facts around
sync'ing the fs. But anyway the data size written should be nearly doubled
compared to data=ordered. Reiserfs journaling has to be real incredible in
comparison to ext3(ordered). I have the impression that large files are hit
most.
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-11 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030808002918.723abb08.skraw@ithnet.com>
2003-08-08 14:54 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-08 15:05 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-08 15:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 21:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-10 23:23 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-11 9:33 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-08-18 20:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-13 10:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 14:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-13 14:59 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 15:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 15:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 16:04 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-13 16:34 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-13 22:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-14 8:45 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-14 17:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-14 17:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 2:08 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-15 9:40 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:28 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 12:55 ` Chris Mason
2003-08-20 14:21 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (yet another oops for rc2) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 9:24 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (case closed) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-09-05 13:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-15 10:13 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-15 10:31 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-18 15:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-18 20:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 22:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-19 1:12 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 7:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-19 14:18 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 18:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-19 13:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-13 15:21 ` Jim Gifford
2003-08-13 17:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-10 14:23 ` Keith Owens
2003-08-02 12:27 2.4.22-pre lockups (decoded oops for pre8) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-06 7:41 ` 2.4.22-pre lockups (now decoded oops for pre10) Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 8:58 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-06 9:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-06 9:36 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06 12:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-18 14:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-08-06 18:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-07 2:14 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07 5:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-07 12:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <3F325198.2010301@namesys.com>
2003-08-07 13:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 20:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 20:39 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-18 21:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-07 15:52 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030811113302.6f30a256.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.