From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:39:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030811233943.GI32488@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884580000.1060642229@flay>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> kpmd_ctor() is unusual; how many runs does this profile represent?
>> Does it represent the first run? Ideally, all your kernel pmd's should
>> be cached. If it's not the first run, then logged slab cache statistics
>> would be interesting to determine whether this is still the case even
>> while effective cacheing is going on or whether slab cache reaping is
>> blowing these things away (i.e. either ineffective cacheing is happening
>> or for some reason cacheing them isn't good enough).
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> It's the average of 5 runs, after an initial warmup run which is discarded.
Okay, logging /proc/slabinfo and /proc/meminfo at various points
throughout the run would be helpful here.
-- wli
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:39:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030811233943.GI32488@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <884580000.1060642229@flay>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> kpmd_ctor() is unusual; how many runs does this profile represent?
>> Does it represent the first run? Ideally, all your kernel pmd's should
>> be cached. If it's not the first run, then logged slab cache statistics
>> would be interesting to determine whether this is still the case even
>> while effective cacheing is going on or whether slab cache reaping is
>> blowing these things away (i.e. either ineffective cacheing is happening
>> or for some reason cacheing them isn't good enough).
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> It's the average of 5 runs, after an initial warmup run which is discarded.
Okay, logging /proc/slabinfo and /proc/meminfo at various points
throughout the run would be helpful here.
-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-11 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-10 3:39 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-10 3:39 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-10 9:01 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Gabor MICSKO
2003-08-10 9:08 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-10 17:41 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-08-11 18:26 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 George Anzinger
2003-08-11 18:26 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 George Anzinger
2003-08-13 20:18 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 20:18 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Sam Ravnborg
2003-08-13 20:58 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-13 20:58 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-13 22:49 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-08-14 8:17 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 and the -g thing George Anzinger
2003-08-14 8:17 ` George Anzinger
2003-08-11 14:03 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Luiz Capitulino
2003-08-11 14:03 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Luiz Capitulino
2003-08-11 14:35 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 14:35 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 15:17 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Con Kolivas
2003-08-11 15:17 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Con Kolivas
2003-08-11 18:05 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 18:05 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 18:57 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 18:57 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 21:55 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Con Kolivas
2003-08-11 21:55 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Con Kolivas
2003-08-11 22:19 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 22:19 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 18:39 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-11 18:39 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-08-11 20:17 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 20:17 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 22:16 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 22:16 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 22:50 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 22:50 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 23:00 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 23:00 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2003-08-11 23:39 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-08-11 23:39 ` 2.6.0-test3-mm1 William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030811233943.GI32488@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.