From: M Taylor <mctylr@privacy.nb.ca>
To: A Gilmore <agilmore@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: transparent internet via radio
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:06:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030825150606.A17749@pull.privacy.nb.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1061769408.1126.98.camel@fluid.redwork.net>; from agilmore@shaw.ca on Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700, A Gilmore wrote:
> Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
>
> So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
> internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
>
> Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> interfacing the protocols?
Are you a licensed amateur radio (ham) operator? You don't mention
a callsign, and some of your questions seem quite basic regarding
VHF & higher propagation, which suggests perhaps you are not.
Amateur radio in Canada and elsewhere has content restrictions and
is for non-commercial usage, which are not agreeable to most people's
general Internet usage. So for general wireless Internet access,
I suspect that the amateur radio solution is not the best general
solution.
I would suggest looking into license-free/exempt "WiFi" or 802.11(b)
wireless ethernet. These are low cost (cheaper than a commercial TNC
in most cases) devices provide low power (often 100mW) 2.4 GHz
(microwave) with speeds up to 11Mbps (802.11b) or higher (802.11g).
With a clear line of sight, and a small directional antenna
you can easily get a stable connection over 10km or more.
I would not recommend consumer oriented 802.11b for a Wireless ISP
(WISP) as they tend to have serious issues scaling, and the
license-free status means you must tolerate intereference.
See BC Wireless for more Canadian specific information:
<http://www.bcwireless.net/>
-ve1mct
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-25 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-08-26 14:18 ` John Feist
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor [this message]
2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
2003-08-25 20:31 ` Dennis Boone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030825150606.A17749@pull.privacy.nb.ca \
--to=mctylr@privacy.nb.ca \
--cc=agilmore@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.