From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:24:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030831152449.GA6893@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:21:37AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://cs.nmu.edu/~benchmark/ has an interesting little graph
> of LMBench results vs. Linux kernel version, all done with the
> same compiler.
>
> Has anyone seen a similar graph showing LMBench results vs. gcc version,
> all done with the same Linux kernel?
> And does everyone agree that's a meaningful way to compare the
> performance of code generated by different compilers?
>
> I happen to have a number of versions of gcc handy, and was
> considering making such a graph, but was hoping somebody
> else had already done it.
It's been a while since I looked at lmbench but: why do you think this
would be useful? It's a system and kernel benchmark; I doubt
optimization makes much difference at all.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-31 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 7:21 LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 14:00 ` Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 14:28 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3F520773.1070907@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <20030831145956.GE23783@work.bitmover.com>
2003-08-31 22:53 ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-08-31 15:59 ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 16:18 ` Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 17:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-31 16:57 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030831152449.GA6893@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.