All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:21:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com> (raw)

http://cs.nmu.edu/~benchmark/ has an interesting little graph
of LMBench results vs. Linux kernel version, all done with the
same compiler.

Has anyone seen a similar graph showing LMBench results vs. gcc version,
all done with the same Linux kernel?
And does everyone agree that's a meaningful way to compare the
performance of code generated by different compilers?

I happen to have a number of versions of gcc handy, and was
considering making such a graph, but was hoping somebody
else had already done it.

(There seems to be large variations in successive runs of LMBench
when I try it, so it may take me a bit of work to get repeatable
results.)

Thanks,
Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-31  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-31  7:21 Dan Kegel [this message]
2003-08-31 14:00 ` LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 14:28   ` Dan Kegel
     [not found]   ` <3F520773.1070907@kegel.com>
     [not found]     ` <20030831145956.GE23783@work.bitmover.com>
2003-08-31 22:53       ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-31 15:59   ` Dan Kegel
2003-08-31 16:18     ` Larry McVoy
2003-08-31 17:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-31 16:57 rwhron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F51A201.8090108@kegel.com \
    --to=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.