From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902174126.GB14209@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901120208.GC1358@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Mon, Sep 01 2003, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I think we need to expand the platform device support to include the
> > notion of platform drivers. For example:
> >
> > struct platform_driver {
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, u32);
> > int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
> > struct device_driver drv;
> > };
> >
> > (Aside: I like the movement of the suspend/resume methods to the bus_type,
> > and I'd like to see the probe/remove methods also move there. For the
> > vast majority of cases, the probe/remove methods in struct device_driver
> > end up pointing at the same functions for any particular bus.)
>
> But what about those few devices that need special handling? Like
> flush write cache on IDE disk but not on cdrom?
ide-cd should have a flush write cache as well, for mtr, dvd-ram, cd-rw
with packet writing, etc.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, Sep 01 2003, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I think we need to expand the platform device support to include the
> > notion of platform drivers. For example:
> >
> > struct platform_driver {
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, u32);
> > int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
> > struct device_driver drv;
> > };
> >
> > (Aside: I like the movement of the suspend/resume methods to the bus_type,
> > and I'd like to see the probe/remove methods also move there. For the
> > vast majority of cases, the probe/remove methods in struct device_driver
> > end up pointing at the same functions for any particular bus.)
>
> But what about those few devices that need special handling? Like
> flush write cache on IDE disk but not on cdrom?
ide-cd should have a flush write cache as well, for mtr, dvd-ram, cd-rw
with packet writing, etc.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-02 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-22 21:08 [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 21:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-23 1:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-08-23 16:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 19:05 ` [PM] powering down special devices Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 19:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 9:52 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-23 10:47 ` Russell King
2003-08-24 11:54 ` Russell King
2003-08-26 15:39 ` [PM] Config Options Patrick Mochel
2003-08-24 12:08 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Russell King
2003-08-25 15:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 16:27 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 16:57 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-25 17:14 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 17:34 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-28 15:38 ` Platform Devices Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 12:02 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 17:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-09-09 20:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-09 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 21:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:07 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 23:07 ` [PM] Passing suspend level down to drivers Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:23 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-10 0:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-10 6:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-09-10 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-09 23:15 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Alan Cox
2003-09-09 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-25 17:16 ` Russell King
2003-08-22 22:04 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030902174126.GB14209@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.