All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, mochel@osdl.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:28:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030902200451.GA4095@brodo.de>; from linux@brodo.de on Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 2.)	frequency: B	frequency: A	-- the CPUfreq core and all
> 					   (external) drivers think[*] the
> 					   CPU frequency is equal to B, but
> 					   it is A. Because of this, the CPU
> 					   speed must be set AS SOON AS
> 					   POSSIBLE to B. But as all other
> 					   pieces of kernel code think it 
> 					   still equals "B", there is no
> 					   need to call notifiers. The
> 					   irqs_disabled() check in
> 					   cpufreq_notifiy_transition() is
> 					   triggered and blocks the call to
> 					   the notifiers.
> 
> So, [as long as you use the latest 2.6.0-test4 source] I doubt that it is 
> a hang in the cpufreq transition notifiers as they are never even called.

In which case, its probably this in cpu-sa1110.c:

        /*
         * The clock could be going away for some time.  Set the SDRAMs
         * to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles).  To get
         * through the whole array, we need to wait 262144 mclk cycles.
         * We wait 20ms to be safe.
         */
        sdram_set_refresh(2);
        set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
        schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000);

then.  I guess we need to case this with irqs_disabled() and use mdelay
instead.  Grr.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

      reply	other threads:[~2003-09-02 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-02 17:21 cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem Russell King
2003-09-02 20:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-02 22:28   ` Russell King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.